Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

Апробация на скала за междуличностно доверие

Validaiton Of The Interpersonal Trust Scale

Апробация на скала за междуличностно доверие

Abstract

Резюме Междуличностното доверие е един от основните компоненти в личните взаимоотношения, работната среда и икономическия обмен. Учените в областта на социалните науки твърдят, че доверието води до индивидуално благополучие и гладко функциониране на обществото. Доверяваме се на колегите си, че ще работят за групови проекти; доверяваме се на компаниите, че ще ни предоставят надеждни продукти и услуги; доверяваме се и на правителствата, че ще се отнасят честно и справедливо спрямо населението. Поставяйки доверието в центъра на социалните отношения, Ротър въвежда скалата за междуличностно доверие за измерване на индивидуалните различия в доверието. Той предлага тезата, че поведението на доверие е свързано с общото очакване, че на другите може да се разчита, и че това очакване се формира чрез ежедневните взаимодействия с приятели и познати, авторитети, както и с други социални агенти. По този начин скалата измерва степента, в която хората вярват, че на другите може да се разчита, че ще изпълнят обещанията си. В различни изследвания се обсъжда, че тази скала измерва доверието като отделен конструкт или като четири свързани измерения: политически цинизъм, междуличностна експлоатация, обществено лицемерие и надеждно изпълнение на дадена роля. Настоящото изследване има за цел да апробира за български условия скалата за междуличностно доверие на Ротър. За валидиране на резултатите е използванa Скала за социална желателност-15. Ключови думи: доверие, междуличностно доверие, социална желателност, социално функциониране, индивидуални различия, измерване 

Abstract Interpersonal trust is one of the key components in personal relationships, work environments and economic exchanges. Social scientists argue that trust leads to individual well-being and smooth functioning of society. We trust colleagues to work on group projects; we trust companies to provide reliable products and services; and we trust governments to treat the population fairly and justly. Placing trust at the centre of social relations, Rotter introduced the Interpersonal Trust Scale to measure individual differences in trust. He proposes that trust behaviour is related to the general expectation that others can be relied upon, and that this expectation is formed through everyday interactions with friends and acquaintances, authority figures, and other social agents. Thus, the scale measures the extent to which people believe that others can be relied upon to fulfill their promises. Various studies have discussed that this scale measures trust as either a separate construct or as four related dimensions: political cynicism, interpersonal exploitation, societal hypocrisy, and reliable role performance. The present study aims to validate Rother’s Interpersonal Trust Scale for Bulgarian settings. The Social Desirability Scale-15 was used to validate the results. Keywords: trust, interpersonal trust, social desirability, social functioning, individual differences, measurement 

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green