Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Model . 2024
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Model . 2024
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Model . 2024
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Model . 2024
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Pie Model for Lemmatization, POS Tagging, and Morphological Analysis of Eastern Armenian

Authors: Vidal-Gorène, Chahan; Tomeh, Nadi; Khurshudyan, Victoria;

Pie Model for Lemmatization, POS Tagging, and Morphological Analysis of Eastern Armenian

Abstract

The models were trained for lemmatization, POS-tagging, and morphological analysis of Eastern Armenian. The training dataset used was the Eastern Armenian corpus from Universal Dependencies (09/2024 release), comprising 52,950 wordforms (42,337 for training / 5,370 for validation / 5,243 for testing). Sentences cover a large set of documents: blog, fiction, grammar-examples, legal, news, nonfiction. Note that the input data should be pre-tokenized. The model development was part of the ANR project ANR-21-CE38-0006 "DALiH - Digitizing Armenian Linguistic Heritage", led by Victoria Khurshudyan (Inalco, SeDyL, CNRS, IRD), with initial contributions from Calfa. Models have been developed for the EMNLP 2024 conference (NLP4DH workshop), and rely on the PIE framework. Data : For the training dataset, see: Yavrumyan Marat and ArmTDP team : Github Repository Results : For detailed experiments and results, please refer to the linked publication. The following table displays accuracy (f1-score). task_name all ambiguous-tokens known-tokens unknown-tokens abbr 0.997 (0.8622) 0.8864 (0.7991) 0.997 (0.8631) 0.9986 (0.7497) adptype 0.9916 (0.6512) 0.8246 (0.7106) 0.9915 (0.6526) 0.9945 (0.3324) animacy 0.9588 (0.92) 0.8949 (0.8311) 0.966 (0.9327) 0.733 (0.6866) aspect 0.9909 (0.538) 0.9727 (0.7321) 0.993 (0.6421) 0.9245 (0.4644) case 0.9714 (0.9624) 0.9167 (0.8801) 0.977 (0.9672) 0.792 (0.7241) definite 0.9738 (0.9664) 0.9076 (0.8619) 0.9782 (0.9713) 0.8346 (0.8481) degree 0.9491 (0.2435) 0.2378 (0.0961) 0.9482 (0.2434) 0.9794 (0.4948) lemma 0.9909 (0.9502) 0.9434 (0.7085) 0.996 (0.9917) 0.8298 (0.6842) mood 0.9942 (0.8632) 0.9762 (0.847) 0.9959 (0.8962) 0.9382 (0.6227) nametype 0.9809 (0.359) 0.8 (0.1778) 0.9823 (0.3639) 0.9369 (0.2956) number 0.9619 (0.7737) 0.9301 (0.8898) 0.9664 (0.782) 0.8181 (0.6069) number[psor] 0.9954 (0.3326) 0.2 (0.1667) 0.996 (0.3327) 0.9753 (0.3292) numform 0.991 (0.3975) 0.7115 (0.4157) 0.9909 (0.3974) 0.9952 (0.4994) numtype 0.9968 (0.6147) 0.8571 (0.8381) 0.997 (0.623) 0.9904 (0.6035) person 0.9936 (0.9532) 0.986 (0.9641) 0.9954 (0.9702) 0.9362 (0.66) person[psor] 0.9949 (0.2494) 0.2 (0.1667) 0.9955 (0.2494) 0.9753 (0.2469) polarity 0.9785 (0.9558) 0.9318 (0.9015) 0.9799 (0.9588) 0.9348 (0.8632) pos 0.9911 (0.9881) 0.9885 (0.9794) 0.9959 (0.9928) 0.8387 (0.5319) poss 0.9959 (0.9283) 0.8213 (0.7389) 0.9958 (0.9289) 0.9986 (0.4997) prontype 0.995 (0.9162) 0.9101 (0.8508) 0.9951 (0.917) 0.9918 (0.363) subcat 0.9805 (0.9232) 0.8349 (0.836) 0.984 (0.9351) 0.8696 (0.7021) tense 0.9942 (0.9726) 0.9767 (0.4651) 0.995 (0.9776) 0.9671 (0.7785) verbform 0.985 (0.7933) 0.9565 (0.7614) 0.9869 (0.7964) 0.9266 (0.7046) voice 0.9753 (0.5995) 0.8213 (0.807) 0.9787 (0.6107) 0.8655 (0.5098) Models can be used on Deucalion, the lemmatization service from École nationale des chartes-PSL. Selected Bibliography: Vidal-Gorène, C., Khurshudyan, V., & Donabédian-Demopoulos, A. (2020, December). Recycling and comparing morphological annotation models for Armenian diachronic-variational corpus processing. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects (pp. 90-101). Vidal-Gorène C., Tomeh N., and Khurshudyan V. (2024, November). Cross-Dialectal Transfer and Zero-Shot Learning for Armenian Varieties: A Comparative Analysis of RNNs, Transformers and LLMs. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Natural Language Processing for Digital Humanities, pages 438–449, Miami, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.

Keywords

Dialects, NLP, Armenian, Lemmatization

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average