
This chapter argues that even if typological considerations make it very likely thatthe category of support-verb constructions did in fact exist in Proto-Indo-Europeanand the support-verb use of roots such as *dheh1 ‘to put’ or *deh3 ‘to give’ may beassumed for the parent language with a sufficient degree of certainty, the reconstruction of specific support-verb constructions will probably never be entirely successful. Apart from the almost complete lack of comparable constructions built ofcognate elements in the individual daughter languages it also runs counter to various theoretical and methodological principles of comparative historical linguistics.
történeti nyelvtan, P140 Historical linguistics / nyelvtörténet, 430, 400
történeti nyelvtan, P140 Historical linguistics / nyelvtörténet, 430, 400
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
