Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Script and data from: The best of two worlds: toward large-scale monitoring of biodiversity combining metabarcoding and optimised parataxonomic validation.

Authors: Penel, Benoit; Meynard, Christine; Benoit, Laure; Bourdonnée, Axel; Clamens, Anne-Laure; Soldati, Laurent; Migeon, Alain; +4 Authors

Script and data from: The best of two worlds: toward large-scale monitoring of biodiversity combining metabarcoding and optimised parataxonomic validation.

Abstract

Publication abstract In a context of unprecedented biodiversity decline, there is a critical need for reliable monitoring tools to measure species diversity and their dynamic at large scales. DNA-based identification methods, e.g. metabarcoding, were proposed as an effective way to reach this aim. However, metabarcoding suffers from intrinsic limitations (e.g. false positive and false negative species identifications) that are difficult to quantify in the field, and do not allow the estimation of species abundance. To overcome these obstacles, we propose the Human-Assisted Molecular Identification (HAMI) framework, based on a combination of metabarcoding and image-based parataxonomic validation of outputs and recording of abundance data. This approach was tested on beetles from a national biodiversity monitoring initiative. We assessed the advantages of using HAMI over the exclusive use of a metabarcoding approach by examining 491 samples. We show that an average of 23% of the specific composition is missed when relying exclusively on metabarcoding, this percent being consistently higher in the most species-rich samples. In addition, on average 20% of the species composition identified by molecular-only approaches correspond to false positives linked to cross-sample contaminations or mis-identified barcode sequences in databases. The combination of molecular methodologies and parataxonomic validation in HAMI significantly reduces metabarcoding’s intrinsic bias and recovers reliable abundance data. This approach also enabling users to engage in a virtuous circle of database improvement through the identification of specimens associated with missing barcodes or barcodes with erroneous assignations. As such, HAMI fills an important gap in large-scale biodiversity monitoring by providing appropriate data. File description: MiSeq raw sequences of the COI barcode from 491 Coleoptera field samples : The Raw_sequencage_data ZIP directory contains the FASTQ files of the paired-end reads (R1: reads 1; R2: reads 2) produced for each Coleoptera field samples in duplicate using the MiSeq platform GenSeq (ISEM - University of Montpellier) The HAMI_data_script_results_R zip directory contains Rmarkdown script files (.Rmd and .html) and associated data used to analyse the systemic errors of the metabarcoding approach (N= 491 Coleoptera field samples). The HAMI_pipeline zip directory contains all the codes associated with the HAMI pipeline, as well as a ReadMe file and a test data set. The Residual_chimera.zip directory contains lists of residual chimeric sequences that were not filtered using FROGS pipeline but secondarily detected with the de novo approach implemented in HAMI pipeline with ‘isBimeraDenovo’ R function from DADA2 v1.28.0. It contains two distinct files according to the two sequencing runs.

Keywords

Coleoptera, Morphological validation, RTUs, Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units, Recognizable Taxonomic Units, Metabarcoding, MOTUs, Biodiversity assessment, Taxonomic impediment

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
INRAE