
Aspicilia adamanticola Hue (1910: 39) Type (lectotype, designated here):— KOREA. Nai-Hpyeng, July 1906, R. P. Faurie 221 (LE L-7526!, isolectotype BM 001107771 [digital photograph!]). The species was described from the northern part of the Korean peninsula. In his description Hue mentioned similarity of Aspicilia adamanticola to A. cinerea. According to his view the former is characterized by a whitish, not truly areolate thallus and absence of the lateral cortex. The studied specimen contains norstictic acid and has spores and conidia which agree well with Aspicilia cinerea. The size of spores is (17.0) 17.7–[18.1]–18.4 (20.0) × (10.5) 11.3–[11.6]–11.9 (13.0) μm (n=10) and conidia are (16.0) 17.6–[18.1]–18.5 (21.0) μm (n=10). These data as well as overall morphology (Fig. 1A), thickness of hymenium (100 μm) and moniliform paraphyses makes us conclude that Aspicilia adamanticola is conspecific with A. cinerea.
Published as part of Paukov, Alexander, Nordin, Anders, Roux, Claude, Moon, Kwang Hee & Davydov, Evgeny, 2017, Lectotypification and synonymization of some Aspicilia species (Megasporaceae, Ascomycota) described by A. Hue from Korea and Japan, pp. 94-98 in Phytotaxa 291 (1) on page 94, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.291.1.10, http://zenodo.org/record/13698077
Ascomycota, Patellariales, Aspicilia adamanticola, Dothideomycetes, Fungi, Biodiversity, Aspicilia, Taxonomy, Patellariaceae
Ascomycota, Patellariales, Aspicilia adamanticola, Dothideomycetes, Fungi, Biodiversity, Aspicilia, Taxonomy, Patellariaceae
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
