
FIGURE 29. Fruits and persistent sepals of the Cryptanthoid complex. A. Cryptanthus acaulis (Leme 3812). B. Cryptanthus correiaaraujoi (Leme 2704). C. Cryptanthus dianae (Leme 1172). D. Hoplocryptanthus glaziovii (Leme 1545). E. Hoplocryptanthus schwackeanus (Leme 4250). F. Hoplocryptanthus ferrarius (Leme 6544). G. Hoplocryptanthus vidaliorum (Leme 7606). H. Hoplocryptanthus caracensis (Leme 1853). I. Rokautskyia whitmanii (Leme 5209). J. Rokautskyia odoratissima (Leme 5207). K. Rokautskyia scaposa (Leme 5213). L. Forzzaea sp. nov. (Leme 9082). M. Forzzaea sp. nov. (Leme 9080). N. Orthophytum vasconcelosianum (Leme 8673). O. Orthophytum santaritense (Leme 8945). P. Lapanthus duartei (Leme 8995). Q. Lapanthus itambensis (Leme 9064). R. Sincoraea heleniceae (Leme 4908). S. Orthophytum roseolilacinum (Leme 8885). T. Orthophytum aff. diamantinense (Leme 9079). U. Orthophytum cearense (Leme 7700). V. Orthophytum horridum (Leme 2051). Bars = 5 mm.
Published as part of Leme, Elton M. C., Heller, Sascha, Zizka, Georg & Halbritter, Heidemarie, 2017, Phytotaxa 318 (1) on pages 448-450, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.318.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/13697159
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
