
Many researchers (including me) spend a large chunk of their time writing code, despite having little to no formal training about how to do so effectively. This results in wasted time, lower-quality output, and also negatively impacts the reproducibility and transparency of our work. In this OSCoffee, we will discuss the importance of good research code, and some strategies and tips (some Python-specific, some language agnostic) that can make your code more usable, replicable and adaptable.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
