
Bats make up more than 20% of extant mammals, yet their evolutionary history is largely unknown because of a limited fossil record and conflicting or incomplete phylogenies. Here, we present a highly resolved molecular phylogeny for all extant bat families. Our results support the hypothesis that megabats are nested among four major microbat lineages, which originated in the early Eocene [52 to 50 million years ago (Mya)], coincident with a significant global rise in temperature, increase in plant diversity and abundance, and the zenith of Tertiary insect diversity. Our data suggest that bats originated in Laurasia, possibly in North America, and that three of the major microbat lineages are Laurasian in origin, whereas the fourth is Gondwanan. Combining principles of ghost lineage analysis with molecular divergence dates, we estimate that the bat fossil record underestimates (unrepresented basal branch length, UBBL) first occurrences by, on average, 73% and that the sum of missing fossil history is 61%.
570, Asia, bats, bat, Chiroptera, Bats, Animals, Animalia, Chordata, Phylogeny, Likelihood Functions, Geography, Molecular Phylogeny, Fossils, Temperature, 500, Genetics and Genomics, Bayes Theorem, Fossil Record, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Biodiversity, Plants, South America, Biological Evolution, Europe, Biogeography, Genes, Echolocation, Flight, Animal, Africa, North America, Mammalia, Zoology, Evolutionary History
570, Asia, bats, bat, Chiroptera, Bats, Animals, Animalia, Chordata, Phylogeny, Likelihood Functions, Geography, Molecular Phylogeny, Fossils, Temperature, 500, Genetics and Genomics, Bayes Theorem, Fossil Record, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Biodiversity, Plants, South America, Biological Evolution, Europe, Biogeography, Genes, Echolocation, Flight, Animal, Africa, North America, Mammalia, Zoology, Evolutionary History
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 949 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% |
