
pmid: 24586500
pmc: PMC3938448
(Uploaded by Plazi for the Bat Literature Project) BACKGROUND: Research regarding zoonotic diseases often focuses on infectious diseases animals have given to humans. However, an increasing number of reports indicate that humans are transmitting pathogens to animals. Recent examples include methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, influenza A virus, Cryptosporidium parvum, and Ascaris lumbricoides. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of published literature regarding reverse zoonoses and highlight the need for future work in this area. METHODS: An initial broad literature review yielded 4763 titles, of which 4704 were excluded as not meeting inclusion criteria. After careful screening, 56 articles (from 56 countries over three decades) with documented human-to-animal disease transmission were included in this report. FINDINGS: In these publications, 21 (38%) pathogens studied were bacterial, 16 (29%) were viral, 12 (21%) were parasitic, and 7 (13%) were fungal, other, or involved multiple pathogens. Effected animals included wildlife (n = 28, 50%), livestock (n = 24, 43%), companion animals (n = 13, 23%), and various other animals or animals not explicitly mentioned (n = 2, 4%). Published reports of reverse zoonoses transmission occurred in every continent except Antarctica therefore indicating a worldwide disease threat. INTERPRETATION: As we see a global increase in industrial animal production, the rapid movement of humans and animals, and the habitats of humans and wild animals intertwining with great complexity, the future promises more opportunities for humans to cause reverse zoonoses. Scientific research must be conducted in this area to provide a richer understanding of emerging and reemerging disease threats. As a result, multidisciplinary approaches such as One Health will be needed to mitigate these problems.
habitat, bat, systematic review, Zoonoses, Chiroptera, virus infection, Chordata, Domestic, disease transmission, Q, article, human-animal bond, mycosis, R, risk assessment, Biodiversity, parasite virulence, risk factor, Influenza A virus, Animals, Domestic, Mammalia, parasitosis, Medicine, Research Article, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, virus virulence, 570, wildlife, Science, bats, Wild, 610, Animals, Wild, Communicable Diseases, Animals, Humans, Animalia, host pathogen interaction, nonhuman, bacterial virulence, bacterial infection, zoonosis, livestock, fungal virulence, Antarctica, animal disease
habitat, bat, systematic review, Zoonoses, Chiroptera, virus infection, Chordata, Domestic, disease transmission, Q, article, human-animal bond, mycosis, R, risk assessment, Biodiversity, parasite virulence, risk factor, Influenza A virus, Animals, Domestic, Mammalia, parasitosis, Medicine, Research Article, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, virus virulence, 570, wildlife, Science, bats, Wild, 610, Animals, Wild, Communicable Diseases, Animals, Humans, Animalia, host pathogen interaction, nonhuman, bacterial virulence, bacterial infection, zoonosis, livestock, fungal virulence, Antarctica, animal disease
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 205 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
