
pmid: 28116770
handle: 1893/24974
AbstractLatitudinal gradients in biotic interactions have been suggested as causes of global patterns of biodiversity and phenotypic variation. Plant biologists have long speculated that outcrossing mating systems are more common at low than high latitudes owing to a greater predictability of plant–pollinator interactions in the tropics; however, these ideas have not previously been tested. Here, we present the first global biogeographic analysis of plant mating systems based on 624 published studies from 492 taxa. We found a weak decline in outcrossing rate towards higher latitudes and among some biomes, but no biogeographic patterns in the frequency of self‐incompatibility. Incorporating life history and growth form into biogeographic analyses reduced or eliminated the importance of latitude and biome in predicting outcrossing or self‐incompatibility. Our results suggest that biogeographic patterns in mating system are more likely a reflection of the frequency of life forms across latitudes rather than the strength of plant–pollinator interactions.
life history, 570, pollination, self-fertilisation, latitudinal gradient, outcrossing, Biotic interactions, bats, bat, Self-Fertilization, Magnoliopsida, Chiroptera, Animalia, Pollination, Chordata, plant–pollinator interaction, Plant Dispersal, Reproduction, floral evolution, sexual system, Biodiversity, breeding system, Cycadopsida, Mammalia
life history, 570, pollination, self-fertilisation, latitudinal gradient, outcrossing, Biotic interactions, bats, bat, Self-Fertilization, Magnoliopsida, Chiroptera, Animalia, Pollination, Chordata, plant–pollinator interaction, Plant Dispersal, Reproduction, floral evolution, sexual system, Biodiversity, breeding system, Cycadopsida, Mammalia
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 97 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
