
The study was on the adoption of the Collaborative Invitation, Exploration, Proposing-Explanation, and Taking action (CIEPT) instructional approach to design chemistry lesson plans and investigating if the implementation the of CIEPT instructional approach in chemistry classrooms could improve students’ academic performance. A pretest, posttest, control group, and quasi-experimental research design was adopted in this study. The instrument used for data collection was the Chemistry Academic Performance Test (CAPT). CAPT was adopted from the West African Examination Council (WAEC) past examination question papers of 2005-2022. Kuder-Richardson (KR-21) formula was used to test the internal consistency of CAPT which yielded a reliability value of 0.91. A sample of 152 students was purposively sampled from 4 schools out of 47 schools in the study area. Three research questions and three null hypotheses guided the study. The research questions were answered using Mean and Standard Deviation scores while the null hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level of significance using results from Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). The study revealed that there is a significant difference between the mean academic performance of students taught Chemistry using CIEPT and the discussion method of teaching [F1, 151=111.210, p<0.05]. It was found that no significant difference between the mean academic performance of male and female students taught Chemistry using the CIEPT approach [F1, 78 =.420, P>0.05]. It was recommended among others that since the CIEPT approach was found to be an effective approach for improving students’ academic performance irrespective of gender; Chemistry teacher’s trainee and serving teachers should be trained on how to adopt and use the CIEPT approach.
Chemistry, Collaborative Invitation, Exploration, Proposing-Explanation and Taking action (CIEPT) instructional approach, Organic chemistry, students' academic performance
Chemistry, Collaborative Invitation, Exploration, Proposing-Explanation and Taking action (CIEPT) instructional approach, Organic chemistry, students' academic performance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
