Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Lab Study Dataset: Fast and Secure Contact Exchange in Groups

Authors: Putz, Florentin; Haesler, Steffen; Hollick, Matthias;

Lab Study Dataset: Fast and Secure Contact Exchange in Groups

Abstract

This record contains the lab study dataset and evaluation R source code from the paper "Sounds Good? Fast and Secure Contact Exchange in Groups" by Florentin Putz, Steffen Haesler, and Matthias Hollick in Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (CSCW '24). Abstract: Trustworthy digital communication requires the secure exchange of contact information, but current approaches lack usability and scalability for larger groups of users. We evaluate the usability of two secure contact exchange systems: the current state of the art, SafeSlinger, and our newly designed protocol, PairSonic, which extends trust from physical encounters to spontaneous online communication. Our lab study (N=45) demonstrates PairSonic's superior usability, automating the tedious verification tasks from previous approaches via an acoustic out-of-band channel. Although participants significantly preferred our system, minimizing user effort surprisingly decreased the perceived security for some users, who associated security with complexity. We discuss user perceptions of the different protocol components and identify remaining usability barriers for CSCW application scenarios. Dataset: Our pseudonymous dataset contains usability, security, and preference scores, completion times, reported usage of nine types of social and collaborative tools, and seven demographic and control variables, for each of our 45 participants. Analysis source code: Our R Markdown source code includes the full reproducible code of our analysis. This code generates all statistical figures from our paper. The code can also be used to reproduce our quantitative results and tables. Please refer to the README.md file and our paper for further details about the dataset and the lab study. Acknowledgments: This work has been funded by the LOEWE initiative (Hesse, Germany) within the emergenCITY center [LOEWE/1/12/519/03/05.001(0016)/72].

Related Organizations
Keywords

Contact Sharing, Social Cybersecurity, Ad-Hoc, Online Collaboration, Usability, Nearby, Proximity, NFC, Group Pairing, Acoustic Communication, Open-Source, Trust Establishment, Coupling, Lab Study, Authentication Ceremony, Android, Data-Over-Sound, Decentral, Device Association, Instant Messaging, Bonding, Spontaneous, WiFi, Peer-To-peer Authentication, MitM attacks, Binding, Secure Device Pairing, Key Verification, Interoperability, Prototype, Contact Management, Privacy, End-To-End-Encrypted Messaging, Security, Public-Key Cryptography, User Perception, Smartphone, Usable Security, User Interaction

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average