Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Effects of either Sitagliptin or Pioglitazone Addition on Metformin in Patients with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetic Mellitus

Authors: Priyanka Bhagat; Nilam Nigam; Kriti Jalota; Syed Shadman Ahmad; Shrawan Kumar;

Effects of either Sitagliptin or Pioglitazone Addition on Metformin in Patients with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetic Mellitus

Abstract

Objective: Compare and study the use of metformin and DPP-4 inhibitors in conjunction with currently used combination treatments. Materials and Methods: In this 16-week study, sitagliptin and pioglitazone were compared as add-on treatments for type 2 diabetes mellitus patients whose condition was not sufficiently controlled by metformin alone. In addition to metformin, 52 patients were randomly assigned to receive either sitagliptin 100 mg (group 1) or pioglitazone 30 mg (group 2). Change in HbA1c served as the main efficacy end objective. Changes in body weight, lipid profile, and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were considered secondary end objectives. HbA1c significantly dropped in both groups. Results: In neither group did the mean FPG reductions differ significantly from one another. In group 1, the mean body weight and body mass index significantly decreased, while the same variables significantly increased in group 2. High density lipoprotein (HDL-C) and triglyceride levels significantly dropped in both therapy groups, according to the reports. Conclusion: The drug was well tolerated and did not cause any instances of hypoglycemia. It was determined that pioglitazone was not as effective or well tolerated as sitagliptin when added to metformin.

Objective: Compare and study the use of metformin and DPP-4 inhibitors in conjunction with currently used combination treatments. Materials and Methods: In this 16-week study, sitagliptin and pioglitazone were compared as add-on treatments for type 2 diabetes mellitus patients whose condition was not sufficiently controlled by metformin alone. In addition to metformin, 52 patients were randomly assigned to receive either sitagliptin 100 mg (group 1) or pioglitazone 30 mg (group 2). Change in HbA1c served as the main efficacy end objective. Changes in body weight, lipid profile, and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were considered secondary end objectives. HbA1c significantly dropped in both groups. Results: In neither group did the mean FPG reductions differ significantly from one another. In group 1, the mean body weight and body mass index significantly decreased, while the same variables significantly increased in group 2. High density lipoprotein (HDL-C) and triglyceride levels significantly dropped in both therapy groups, according to the reports. Conclusion: The drug was well tolerated and did not cause any instances of hypoglycemia. It was determined that pioglitazone was not as effective or well tolerated as sitagliptin when added to metformin.

Keywords

DPP-4 inhibitors, diabetes mellitus, add-on therapy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average