<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Improved learning methods in the Humanities as a discipline emphasize critical thinking, interdisciplinary approaches, and the integration of technology to enhance educational experiences. By fostering a more interactive and student-centered learning environment, these methods encourage active participation and deeper engagement with the material. Critical thinking skills are honed through discussions, debates, and analytical exercises that challenge students and researchers to question and interpret various perspectives. Interdisciplinary approaches broaden understanding by linking humanities subjects with sciences, social sciences and the arts, providing a more comprehensive view of human culture and history. The incorporation of technology, such as digital archives, multimedia resources, and online collaborative platforms, enriches the learning process by making vast resources easily accessible and enabling innovative teaching techniques. Smith’s theoretical framework affirms that humanities integrate constructivism, inquiry-based learning, socio-cultural theory, critical pedagogy, and digital humanities. These approaches emphasize active engagement, social interaction, and reflective practices to enhance scholarly understanding and application of humanities content. Additionally, experiential learning opportunities, like field trips, internships, and service-learning projects, connect theoretical knowledge with real-world applications. These methods not only make learning more dynamic and engaging but also prepare students and researchers for diverse career paths by developing versatile skills. By embracing these improved learning methods, Humanities education becomes more relevant and effective in addressing contemporary challenges and fostering a deeper understanding of the human experience.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |