
This study investigates the launch of a fighting brand in the cement industry, focusing on the challenges faced by a market-leading company with an existing flagship brand amidst emerging economical players. The goal is to enable the fighting brand to compete aggressively while avoiding cannibalization of the flagship brand, thus maintaining market leadership. Using a qualitative approach, primary data were collected through semi-structured interviews with internal informants, small contractors, and heads of masons, while secondary data came from the latest Brand Equity Index report of 2023. Key findings reveal that masons equate price with quality and prefer application-based cement for profitability. Differentiation is crucial to minimize cannibalization risks. The study proposes a new target for the fighting brand with detailed psychographics and behavior, aiming for a targeted marketing strategy and communication. Insights for communication management and marketing are provided, suggesting marketing activities based on the 5A model to ensure successful brand management. The study offers new perspectives for the company and the cement industry, emphasizing the importance of a multi-brand strategy to address future challenges.
5A Model, brand management, cannibalization, Cement Industry, Fighting Brand, Marketing Strategy, multi brand strategy, targeted marketing communication
5A Model, brand management, cannibalization, Cement Industry, Fighting Brand, Marketing Strategy, multi brand strategy, targeted marketing communication
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
