{"references": ["IRENA (2012). Renewable energy technologies: cost analysis series. International Renewable Energy Agency: Biomass for power generation. Vol 1-Power Sector issue 1/5.", "Mott MacDonald (2011), Costs of Low-Carbon Generation Technologies. Committee on Climate Change, London.", "Eltrop L (2016). Modern Technologies and Pathways for the Energetic Use of Biomass, Workshop 6-9 September 2016, Resolution Circles, Johannesburg, South Africa.", "Salomone R Saija, G., Mondello, G., Giannotti., Fasul, S., Savastano, D (2017). Environmental impact of food waste bioconversion by insects: Application of Life Cycle Assessment to process using Hermetia illucens, Journal of Cleaner Production 140,890-905.", "Venter, I (2017) Fly farm venture AgriProtein signs deal for 25 fly farms a year. Engineering News. Creamer Media.", "AgriProtein (2017) http://agriprotein.com/our-products/ date accessed: 15/09/17.", "Makan A (2015) Windrow co-composting of natural casings waste with sheep manure and dead leaves. Waste Management 42, 17-22.", "Moh Y, Manaf LA (2017) Solid waste management transformation and future challenges of source separation and recycling practice in Malaysia. Resource, Conservation and Recycling 116, 1-14.", "Aspray TJ, Dimambro ME, Wallace P, Howell G, Frederickson J (2016) Static, dynamic and inoculum augmented respiration based test assessment for determining in-vessel compost stability. Waste Management 42, 3-9.\n[10]\tTamuhairwe JB, Tenyewa JS, Otabbong E, Ledin S (2009) Comparison of four low tech composting methods for market crop waste. Waste management 29, 2274-2281.\n[11]\tVon Blottnitz H (2012) Three Not Two! How Strong is The Case for Separate Organic Waste Management Systems in the Municipal and Commercial Sector? Institute of Waste Management of South Africa. East London Convention Centre, 9-12 October 2012.\n[12]\tEPRI (2011) Power generation technology data for integrated resource plan of South Africa. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA.\n[13]\tWangyao, K., Yamada, M., Endo, Ishigaki, T., Naruoka, T., Towprayoon, S., Chiemchaisri, C., Sutthasil, N. (2010). Methane Generation Rate Constant in Tropical Landfill, Journal of Sustainable Energy and Environment, 1 (4), 181-184.\n[14]\tPipatti R, Svardal P, Alves JWS, Gao Q, Cabrera CL, Mareckova K, Oonk H, Scheehle E, Sharma C, Smith A, Yamada M (2006) Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change, Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Chapter 3, vol. 5: Waste Disposal.\n[15]\t Jenkins BM, Baxter LL, Miles TR (1998) Combustion properties of biomass. Fuel processing technology, 54, 17-46.\n[16]\tHenning PH (1999) The Feeding Program. Feedlot Management Handbook, ANPI, ARC, South Africa.\n[17]\tBanks C (2009) Optimising Anaerobic Digestion: Evaluating the Potential for Anaerobic Digestion to Provide Energy and Soil Amendment. Presentation. University of Southampton.\n[18]\tMak\u00e1di, M, Tom\u00f3csik A, Orosz V (2012) Digestate: a new nutrient source \u2013 review. Biogas, Kumar, S (Ed.). InTech Research Institute of Ny\u00edregyh\u00e1za, RISF, CAAES, University of Debrecen, Hungary.\n[19]\tBreitenbeck GA, Schellinger D (2013) Calculating the Reduction in Material Mass and Volume During Composting. Journal of Compost Science & Utilization,12: ,365-37.\n[20]\tCurry N, Pillay P (2012) Biogas Prediction and Design of a Food Waste to Energy System for the Urban Environment. Renewable Energy, 41, 200-209."]}

This study evaluates the benefits of advanced waste management practices in unlocking waste-to-energy opportunities within the solid waste industry. The key drivers of sustainable waste management practices, specifically with respect to packaging waste-to-energy technology options are discussed. The success of a waste-to-energy system depends significantly on the appropriateness of available technologies, including those that are well established as well as those that are less so. There are hard and soft interventions to be considered when packaging an integrated waste treatment solution. Technology compatibility with variation in feedstock (waste) quality and quantities remains a key factor. These factors influence the technology reliability in terms of production efficiencies and product consistency, which in turn, drives the supply and demand network. Waste treatment technologies rely on the waste material as feedstock; the feedstock varies in quality and quantities depending on several factors; hence, the technology fails, as a result. It is critical to design an advanced waste treatment technology in an integrated approach to minimize the possibility of technology failure due to unpredictable feedstock quality, quantities, conversion efficiencies, and inconsistent product yield or quality. An integrated waste-to-energy approach offers a secure system design that considers sustainable waste management practices.