
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
This is the original EBTF document guidelining the techno-economic modelling and benchmarking of CO2 capture technologies applied to gas and coal-fired power plants. This report is the result of a joint effort of a team of members of the CAESAR, CESAR and DECARBit FP7 projects – the European Benchmarking Task Force (EBTF). It presents a compilation of the contents of two previous reports of the EBTF – assumptions and parameters for Carbon Capture projects from the Common Framework Definition Document and three technical study cases of power plants without and with CO2 capture – and it includes new material related to the costs and economics of carbon capture. The performance of new cycles proposed within the three projects, incorporating innovative capture technologies, should be compared and referred to the performance of these three cases. The three cases are: an Advanced Supercritical Pulverized Coal plant, an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle and a Natural Gas Combined Cycle. For each case, a general description of the case is presented, followed by the specification of the process streams, operational characteristics and operational performance. The final part of the report is dedicated to the economics of these three cycles. This report is thus self sufficient and does not require the reader to know the two previous reports. Authors
CCS; techno-economic analysis; postcombustion; precombustion; guidelines; cost; pulverized coal; natural gas combined cycle
CCS; techno-economic analysis; postcombustion; precombustion; guidelines; cost; pulverized coal; natural gas combined cycle
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
views | 52 | |
downloads | 55 |