Views provided by UsageCounts
This folder contains a dataset for a study that aims to investigate the learning effects of two different instructional approaches with which students can engage with exemplars: comparative judgment and analytic criteria. International business students were instructed to write a five-paragraph essay, preceded by a 30-minutes peer assessment in which students evaluated the quality of ten exemplar essays. Half of the students evaluated the quality of ten exemplars using a list of teacher-based criteria (n = 20), the other group evaluated the quality of the same exemplars through pairwise comparisons (n = 20). Students also provided peer feedback. The written essays are evaluated by a panel of six expert assessors using comparative judgment. The paper is currently under review, the data will be available as soon as it is accepted for publication.
comparative judgment
comparative judgment
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts