
Fig. 9. Scanning electron micrographs of the stylus and the base of stylus of Rhinocypha spp. (a) Rhinocypha biforata, (b) Rhinocypha fenestrella – (i) width of the stylus from the third of hair sensilla, (c) Rhinocypha perforata. (d, e & f) scanning electron micrographs of the base of stylus. (d) Rhinocypha biforata, (e) Rhinocypha fenestrella, (f) Rhinocypha perforata.
Published as part of Mamat, Noorhidayah, Abu, Arpah & Yusoff, Norma-Rashid, 2021, Classification and Morphology of Rhinocypha spp. (Odonata): A Comprehensive Taxonomic Study Within the Females, pp. 1-21 in Zoological Studies 60 (47) on page 12, DOI: 10.6620/ZS.2021.60-47, http://zenodo.org/record/12825078
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
