
Neurodiversity, the recognition of neurological differences as natural variations of the human experience, has always been viewed through multi-disciplinary lenses including psychology, philosophy, sociology, special education, and Christian theology. From the Christian bibliocentric perspective (CBcP), neurodiversity is best understood within the theological framework, especially of divine creation, emphasizing acceptance and inclusion. In contrast, a syncretic perspective on neurodiversity, incorporating elements from various belief systems, has often sought to understand by integrating both spiritual and secular pespectives. While both perspectives advocate for compassion and support, they differ in their approaches to intervention and accommodation. Some Christians reject the syncretic perspective due to concerns about theological integrity and strict adherence to biblical principles. The implications of these differing perspectives are far-reaching, affecting how individuals with neurodivergent traits are perceived, supported, and included within religious communities and the society at large. The CBcP approach may prioritize spiritual guidance and traditional support mechanisms, while the syncretic perspective may embrace a more holistic and inclusive approach, incorporating diverse spiritual practices and secular interventions. Understanding these differences is most crucial for fostering dialogue, promoting acceptance, and advocating for the rights and dignity of individuals with neurodiverse traits within Christian communities and beyond.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
