Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Embracing Neurodiversity: Navigating the Christian Bibliocentric Perspective and Syncretic Challenges

Authors: Guo-Hui Xie;

Embracing Neurodiversity: Navigating the Christian Bibliocentric Perspective and Syncretic Challenges

Abstract

Neurodiversity, the recognition of neurological differences as natural variations of the human experience, has always been viewed through multi-disciplinary lenses including psychology, philosophy, sociology, special education, and Christian theology. From the Christian bibliocentric perspective (CBcP), neurodiversity is best understood within the theological framework, especially of divine creation, emphasizing acceptance and inclusion. In contrast, a syncretic perspective on neurodiversity, incorporating elements from various belief systems, has often sought to understand by integrating both spiritual and secular pespectives. While both perspectives advocate for compassion and support, they differ in their approaches to intervention and accommodation. Some Christians reject the syncretic perspective due to concerns about theological integrity and strict adherence to biblical principles. The implications of these differing perspectives are far-reaching, affecting how individuals with neurodivergent traits are perceived, supported, and included within religious communities and the society at large. The CBcP approach may prioritize spiritual guidance and traditional support mechanisms, while the syncretic perspective may embrace a more holistic and inclusive approach, incorporating diverse spiritual practices and secular interventions. Understanding these differences is most crucial for fostering dialogue, promoting acceptance, and advocating for the rights and dignity of individuals with neurodiverse traits within Christian communities and beyond.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Beta
sdg_colorsSDGs:
Related to Research communities