Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Comparison of Buprenorphine and Magnesium Sulfate as Adjuncts to Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Lower Abdominal Surgeries

Authors: Uma Shankar Kumar; Nitish Kumar; Pramod Kumar Sinha;

Comparison of Buprenorphine and Magnesium Sulfate as Adjuncts to Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Lower Abdominal Surgeries

Abstract

Background: An adjuvant to a local anaesthetic can potentiate spinal anesthesia and provide better postoperative analgesia. Our study has been drafted to evaluate and compare the analgesic potency of the adjuvants, buprenorphine and magnesium, to intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Methods: One hundred and fifty patients by inclusion criteria posted for an elective lower abdominal surgery were randomized into three groups of 50 each. They received 3ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with either 1ml of 0.9% Saline or 1ml of buprenorphine (60μg) or 1ml of magnesium sulphate (50mg). Time for first rescue analgesia, onset of sensory and motor blocks, time to two-segment regression and duration of motor block, haemodynamic parameters, and side effects were studied. Data was analyzed with ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis H, Chi-square and Fischer’s exact tests. Our Study was carried out from April 2020 to March 2021. Results: The time for first analgesic request was 248.70> 186.84> 141.44 minutes, (Buprenorphine> magnesium> control), p<0.001. The onset of sensory and motor blocks was faster in buprenorphine group compared to magnesium and control groups. The time to two-segment regression and duration of motor block was significantly prolonged in buprenorphine and magnesium groups compared to control group. Conclusion: The time to first analgesic request was longer with buprenorphine compared to magnesium sulphate with adequate sedation and negligible complications. Hence, addition of adjuvant buprenorphine (60μg) has a better demonstrable role in postoperative analgesia compared to adjuvant magnesium (50mg) or 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine alone.

Background: An adjuvant to a local anaesthetic can potentiate spinal anesthesia and provide better postoperative analgesia. Our study has been drafted to evaluate and compare the analgesic potency of the adjuvants, buprenorphine and magnesium, to intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Methods: One hundred and fifty patients by inclusion criteria posted for an elective lower abdominal surgery were randomized into three groups of 50 each. They received 3ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with either 1ml of 0.9% Saline or 1ml of buprenorphine (60μg) or 1ml of magnesium sulphate (50mg). Time for first rescue analgesia, onset of sensory and motor blocks, time to two-segment regression and duration of motor block, haemodynamic parameters, and side effects were studied. Data was analyzed with ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis H, Chi-square and Fischer’s exact tests. Our Study was carried out from April 2020 to March 2021. Results: The time for first analgesic request was 248.70> 186.84> 141.44 minutes, (Buprenorphine> magnesium> control), p<0.001. The onset of sensory and motor blocks was faster in buprenorphine group compared to magnesium and control groups. The time to two-segment regression and duration of motor block was significantly prolonged in buprenorphine and magnesium groups compared to control group. Conclusion: The time to first analgesic request was longer with buprenorphine compared to magnesium sulphate with adequate sedation and negligible complications. Hence, addition of adjuvant buprenorphine (60μg) has a better demonstrable role in postoperative analgesia compared to adjuvant magnesium (50mg) or 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine alone.

Keywords

Spinal Anaesthesia; Intrathecal buprenorphine; Intrathecal magnesium; Analgesic efficacy; Intrathecal adjuvants

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average