<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
The European research landscape is becoming increasingly hypercompetitive, resulting in a “publish-or-perish” culture where journal-based metrics are central to evaluating researchers and their work. This inappropriate use of quantitative indicators has a direct negative impact on the career opportunities and well-being of individual researchers. In addition, it demonstrably affects the quality of scholarly outcomes, the diversity of our research communities, and the trustworthiness of our research system as a whole. There are many reasons to reform, and ALLEA, the European Federation of Academies of Sciences and Humanities, has therefore signed the European Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment and joined the associated coalition (CoARA). In addition, ALLEA commits to further supporting its Member Academies in developing assessment criteria based on principles of quality, integrity, diversity, and openness.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |