Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

PERSONEL PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRMESİNDE ALTERNATİF YAKLAŞIM: ARAS YÖNTEMİ

ALTERNATIVE APPROACH IN PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: ARAS METHOD
Authors: Şimşek, Tuğçe;

PERSONEL PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRMESİNDE ALTERNATİF YAKLAŞIM: ARAS YÖNTEMİ

Abstract

Personnel performance evaluation is one of the critical tasks of human resources management. This process, which requires the evaluation of many factors together, brings with it various difficulties. The relative approach and absolute performance approaches used have their own limitations. ARAS method, which is one of the multi-criteria decision-making techniques, has the potential to evaluate many factors reflecting personnel performance together, overcoming the limitations of both approaches. The ARAS method offers a hybrid model structure that ensures objectivity and fairness in personnel performance evaluation by including both absolute performance criteria and relative evaluation. In this study, the use of the ARAS method in personnel performance evaluation and its advantages are revealed. For this purpose, an application is presented based on the 2023 publication performance evaluation of academic staff working in the same department at a state university. The results of the ARAS method were compared with the results of the TOPSIS method, which is frequently used in the literature. The comparison demonstrates the managerial advantages of the ARAS method, pointing to a critical distinction in its ability to identify performance differences and closeness to ideal performance.

Personel performans değerlendirme, insan kaynakları yönetiminin kritik görevlerinden biridir. Çok sayıda faktörün birlikte değerlendirilmesini gerektiren bu süreç çeşitli zorlukları da beraberinde getirir. Kullanılan göreceli yaklaşım ve mutlak performans yaklaşımlarının kendilerine özgü sınırlılıkları bulunmaktadır. Çok kriterli karar verme tekniklerinden olan ARAS yöntemi her iki yaklaşımın sınırlılıklarının üstesinden gelerek personel performansını yansıtan çok sayıda faktörü bir arada değerlendirme potansiyeline sahiptir. ARAS yöntemi hem mutlak performans kriterlerini hem de göreli değerlendirmeyi dahil ederek personel performans değerlendirmede nesnellik ve adaleti sağlayan hibrit bir model yapısı sunar. Bu çalışmada ARAS yönteminin personel performans değerlendirmede kullanımı ve sağladığı avantajlar ortaya konulmaktadır. Bu amaçla bir devlet üniversitesinde aynı bölümde görev yapan akademik personelin 2023 yılı yayın performansı değerlendirmesi üzerinden bir uygulama sunulmuştur. ARAS yöntemi sonuçları literatürde sıklıkla kullanılan TOPSIS yöntemi sonuçlarıyla karşılaştırılmıştır. Karşılaştırma, ARAS yönteminin performans farklılıklarını ve ideal performansa yakınlığı belirleme yeteneğinde kritik bir ayrıma işaret ederek yönetsel avantajlarını ortaya koymaktadır.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Beta
sdg_colorsSDGs:
Related to Research communities