Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 6 versions
addClaim

By Taking Intubation Difficulty Scale As Gold Standard In Assessing Difficult Intubation And Predictive Value Of Restricted Neck Movement

Authors: Dr. Salman Hameed, Dr. Jumana Fatima, Dr. Abdul Sami;

By Taking Intubation Difficulty Scale As Gold Standard In Assessing Difficult Intubation And Predictive Value Of Restricted Neck Movement

Abstract

Introduction: The three main causes of respiratory related injuries of anesthesia are inadequate ventilation, esophageal intubation and difficult tracheal intubation. 17% of all respiratory related injuries are due to difficult intubation and it accounts for 28% of anesthesia related deaths’. Airway maintenance during anesthesia is crucial for adequate oxygenation and ventilation and failure to secure airway can lead to tissue hypoxia and ultimately death. Subjects and Methods: This study involved 126 patients of both genders, aged between I8-70 years undergoing general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation on elective lists Difficult intubation was predicted on restricted neck movement (<80°) and was confirmed on IDS. IDS diagnosis was taken as gold standard and results of restricted neck movement were evaluated accordingly. Written informed consent was taken from every patient. Results: The age of the patients ranged from 18 years to 70 years with a mean of 42.49 + 14.56 years. There were 64 (50.8%) male and 62 (49.2%) female patients in the study group. There were 52 (41.3%) obese patients. Difficult intubation was confirmed in 90 (71.4%) patients on intubation difficulty scale (as per operational definition). 1'he frequency of difficult intubation was higher among obese patients (80.8% vs. 64.9%; p 0.052) however the difference was insignificant. There were 90 (71.4%) true positive patients with 36 false positive patients. It yielded a positive predictive value of 71.4% for restricted neck movement in the prediction of difficult intubation taking IDS as gold standard. Similar positive predictive value was observed across age, gender and obesity groups. Conclusion: The positive predictive value of restricted neck movement (<80°) was found to be 71.4% in predicting difficult intubation among patients undergoing general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation on elective list while taking intubation difficulty scale as the gold standard. Keywords: Difficult Intubation. Intubation Difficulty Scale. Restricted Neck Movement.

Keywords

Introduction: The three main causes of respiratory related injuries of anesthesia are inadequate ventilation, esophageal intubation and difficult tracheal intubation. 17% of all respiratory related injuries are due to difficult intubation and it accounts for 28% of anesthesia related deaths'. Airway maintenance during anesthesia is crucial for adequate oxygenation and ventilation and failure to secure airway can lead to tissue hypoxia and ultimately death. Subjects and Methods: This study involved 126 patients of both genders, aged between I8-70 years undergoing general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation on elective lists Difficult intubation was predicted on restricted neck movement (&lt;80°) and was confirmed on IDS. IDS diagnosis was taken as gold standard and results of restricted neck movement were evaluated accordingly. Written informed consent was taken from every patient. Results: The age of the patients ranged from 18 years to 70 years with a mean of 42.49 + 14.56 years. There were 64 (50.8%) male and 62 (49.2%) female patients in the study group. There were 52 (41.3%) obese patients. Difficult intubation was confirmed in 90 (71.4%) patients on intubation difficulty scale (as per operational definition)1. The frequency of difficult intubation was higher among obese patients (80.8% vs. 64.9%; p 0.052) however the difference was insignificant. There were 90 (71.4%) true positive patients with 36 false positive patients. It yielded a positive predictive value of 71.4% for restricted neck movement in the prediction of difficult intubation taking IDS as gold standard. Similar positive predictive value was observed across age, gender and obesity groups. Conclusion: The positive predictive value of restricted neck movement (&lt;80°) was found to be 71.4% in predicting difficult intubation among patients undergoing general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation on elective list while taking intubation difficulty scale as the gold standard. Keywords: Difficult Intubation. Intubation Difficulty Scale. Restricted Neck Movement., Difficult Intubation. Intubation Difficulty Scale. Restricted Neck Movement., Introduction: The three main causes of respiratory related injuries of anesthesia are inadequate ventilation, esophageal intubation and difficult tracheal intubation. 17% of all respiratory related injuries are due to difficult intubation and it accounts for 28% of anesthesia related deaths'. Airway maintenance during anesthesia is crucial for adequate oxygenation and ventilation and failure to secure airway can lead to tissue hypoxia and ultimately death. Subjects and Methods: This study involved 126 patients of both genders, aged between I8-70 years undergoing general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation on elective lists Difficult intubation was predicted on restricted neck movement (<80°) and was confirmed on IDS. IDS diagnosis was taken as gold standard and results of restricted neck movement were evaluated accordingly. Written informed consent was taken from every patient. Results: The age of the patients ranged from 18 years to 70 years with a mean of 42.49 + 14.56 years. There were 64 (50.8%) male and 62 (49.2%) female patients in the study group. There were 52 (41.3%) obese patients. Difficult intubation was confirmed in 90 (71.4%) patients on intubation difficulty scale (as per operational definition)1. The frequency of difficult intubation was higher among obese patients (80.8% vs. 64.9%; p 0.052) however the difference was insignificant. There were 90 (71.4%) true positive patients with 36 false positive patients. It yielded a positive predictive value of 71.4% for restricted neck movement in the prediction of difficult intubation taking IDS as gold standard. Similar positive predictive value was observed across age, gender and obesity groups. Conclusion: The positive predictive value of restricted neck movement (<80°) was found to be 71.4% in predicting difficult intubation among patients undergoing general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation on elective list while taking intubation difficulty scale as the gold standard. Keywords: Difficult Intubation. Intubation Difficulty Scale. Restricted Neck Movement.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 7
    download downloads 8
  • 7
    views
    8
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
7
8
Green