Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This is a eye-tracking dataset in the BIDS format (http://bids.neuroimaging.io/). Please find the details on the study here: Gagl B. (2016) Blue hypertext is a good design decision: no perceptual disadvantage in reading and successful highlighting of relevant information. PeerJ 4:e2467 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2467 and all analysis scripts and a previous version of the data here: Gagl, B. (2016, April 17). Reading Hypertext. Retrieved from https://osf.io/8c57w/.
{"references": ["Gagl B. (2016) Blue hypertext is a good design decision: no perceptual disadvantage in reading and successful highlighting of relevant information. PeerJ 4:e2467 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2467"]}
Reading, Hyperlinks, Eye-tracking, Para-foveal preprocessing
Reading, Hyperlinks, Eye-tracking, Para-foveal preprocessing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 48 | |
| downloads | 6 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts