Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo...
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Sygma
ZENODO
Presentation . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Recognizing and Rewarding Peer Review

Authors: Rooryck, Johan; Waltman, Ludo;

Recognizing and Rewarding Peer Review

Abstract

In mid-2023, the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) launched a number of working groups in which CoARA members are working together to address key issues in the reform of research assessment. One of these working groups focuses on improving the way peer review activities are recognized and rewarded in research assessments. The lack of recognition for peer review activities is often seen as a major obstacle discouraging researchers to perform peer review and ultimately putting the sustainability of rigorous peer review processes at risk. The working group, led by cOAlition S, consists of a number of research performing and research funding organizations, as well as several other organizations active in scholarly publishing and research assessment. The working group is expected to complete its work in mid-2025. In this contribution, we will give an update on the activities of the working group. We expect to present a draft version of the principles or guidelines that the working group will develop to help organizations improve the way peer review activities are recognized and rewarded. We will also discuss the pilots that members of the working group are going to perform to test the implementation of the proposed principles or guidelines. Organizations that are not (yet) part of the working group will be invited to provide feedback on the draft outcomes of the working group and to consider signing up for piloting the use of the proposed principles or guidelines.

Related Organizations
Keywords

collaborative business models, OPERAS2024, open science, business model design, open scholarly communication, business modelling framework

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green