Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2015
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2015
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2015
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Report On Current Practices In The Handling Of Unavoidable, Unwanted Catches

Authors: Viðarsson, Jonas R.; Guðjónsson, Þorlákur; Sigurðardóttir, Sigríður;

Report On Current Practices In The Handling Of Unavoidable, Unwanted Catches

Abstract

Executive Summary This document is the first deliverable in work package 5 of the DiscardLess project. The project is intended to contribute to a successful implementation of the landing obligation of the reformed Common Fisheries Policy of the EU. The work package 5 focuses on how unwanted, unavoidable catches can be handled on-board the fishing vessels i.e. from catch to first sale. The first step in that work is to provide an overview of current practices in the handling of unwanted catches, which is done in this deliverable. Discard estimates in global and European fisheries are presented; the most common methods of discarding and associated incentives are reviewed; the landing obligation of the CFP as well as landing obligations in other countries are accounted for; monitoring, control and surveillance alternatives are discussed and a number of initiatives temped to reduce bycatch and discards are reviewed. The objective of this deliverable is to present basic back-ground information on discard mitigation issues and the available tools for battling the discard problem. Most of the discard issues and the available tools presented are not directly relevant for what can be applied on-board of the fishing vessels, but are nevertheless necessary information for project partners and stakeholders to identify possible on-board solutions. The focus on what happens to unwanted catches on-board the fishing vessel has mainly been on monitoring, control and surveillance, where Fully Documented Fisheries and the use of Closed-Circuit Television to monitor catches and discards have been at the forefront. There has however not been much attention given to what to do with the unwanted catches once they have been taken aboard the fishing vessels. Species not covered by catch limits, species where high survivability can be demonstrated and catches falling under the de minimis exceptions can still be discarded under the CFP landing obligation; but everything else will need to be landed. In addition will catches under Minimum Conservation Reference Size need to be landed, but cannot be used for direct human consumption. It is clear that storage space will become an issue for much of the EU fleet when the landing obligation is implemented. The available alternatives for addressing that challenge are scarce, but some of the countries that have been working under a discard ban have been trying to find solutions. These solutions are though generally only applicable for large-scale vessels; but 83% of the EU fleet is under 12 meters long and 98% are under 30 meters.

Keywords

Common Fisheries Policy, catch avoidance, Landing Obligations, discards

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 19
    download downloads 18
  • 19
    views
    18
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
1
Average
Average
Average
19
18
Green