Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

2018-2023: 5 years of building a strategy to support open scholarly communication - The example of the Université de Lorraine

Authors: Bassinet, Aricia; Lutz, Jean-François; Querre, Aemil;

2018-2023: 5 years of building a strategy to support open scholarly communication - The example of the Université de Lorraine

Abstract

In 2018, the Université de Lorraine (UL) laid the foundations for its Open Science (OS) policy by making its open repository the institution’s official bibliography. Today, it is involved in all OS areas: scientific publishing, research data, codes and software, bibliometrics. It has achieved this first and foremost through a solid political will, structured in one OS steering committee and three operational committees led by the Open Science vice-president. Comprising researchers, information professionals, IT specialists and legal experts, they lead the university’s OS policy. UL published a series of positions to encourage good publication practices, advise against the payment of Article Processing Charges, take a political stand on the so-called transforming agreements and support the Right Retention Strategy. To support its decisions, UL made engaging financial choices. The university withdrew from Springer deal in 2017, then from Wiley deal in 2023. The funds released have been allocated to an annual support fund for OS infrastructures (€100,000), which helps major players in open scholarly communication like the DOAJ, Erudit and OpenEdition. The institution also provides financial aid (€30,000) for the continued existence and creation of diamond journals such as Philosphia Scientiae. At the same time, UL has set up services and an internal professional network to support its researchers’ publishing initiatives. The university presses publish all books on Open Monograph Press with immediate open access while the journal publishing service supports the creation of new diamond journals. The publishing staff network brings together researchers, publishers and librarians to encourage the transition of the university’s publications to the diamond model. In five years, the Université de Lorraine has built up a robust policy to support Open Science, and more particularly open scholarly communication, based on three pillars: a firm political will, clear budgetary guidelines and the deployment of support services.

Related Organizations
Keywords

OPERAS2024, publishing support services, open science support fund, institutional strategy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average