Views provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11787
The build-up of plasma parameters following the H-mode transition in JET has been analysed in view of its consequences for the alpha power evolution in the access to burning plasma conditions in ITER. JET experiments show that the build-up of plasma temperature both at the plasma core and the plasma edge occurs in timescales comparable to the energy confinement time. On the contrary, the evolution of the edge and core densities differs strongly depending on the level of plasma current in the discharge and of the associated NBI penetration. For higher plasma current H-mode discharges (Ip > 2.0–2.5MA, depending on plasma shape), with naturally higher plasmas densities for which NBI penetration is poorer, the core density evolves in much longer timescales than the edge density leading to the formation of rather hollow density profiles. These hollow density profiles persist for timescales of several energy confinement times until they are usually terminated by a sawtooth. Modelling of the JET experiments with JETTO shows that the density build-up following the H-mode transition can be described with a purely diffusive model, despite the low collisionalities of high current H-mode plasmas at JET. The consequences of these JET experimental/modelling findings for the access to burning plasma conditions in the ITER QDT = 10 scenario are presented.
{"references": ["[1]. Angioni, C., et al., Nuclear Fusion 47 (2007) 1326.", "[2]. Angioni, C., et al., Physics of Plasmas 14 (2007) 055905.", "[3]. Angioni, C., et al., Nuclear Fusion 49 (2009) 055013.", "[4]. Beurskens, M.N.A., et al., Nuclear Fusion 49 (2009) 125006.", "[5]. Beurskens, M.N.A., et al., Nuclear Fusion 53 (2013) 013001.", "[6]. Garzotti, L., et al., Nuclear Fusion 43 (2003) 1829.", "[7]. Garzotti, L., et al., Nuclear Fusion 52 (2012) 013002.", "[8]. Groebner R. J., et al., Nuclear Fusion 41 (2001) 1789.", "[9]. Hawryluk, R.J., et al., Nuclear Fusion 49 (2009) 065012.", "[10]. Hender, T.C., et al., Nuclear Fusion 47 (2007) S128.", "[11]. Loarte, A., et al., Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 44 (2002) 1815.", "[12]. Martin, Y.R., et al., Journal of Physics: Conference Series 123 (2008) 012033.", "[13]. Nunes, I., et al, Proc. 23rd IAEA Fusion Energy Conference Daejon, Republic of Korea, 2010,", "Paper EXC/8-4.", "[14]. Pacher, G.W., et al., Nuclear Fusion 48 (2008) 105003.", "[15]. Sartori, R., et al., Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 46 (2004) 723.", "[16]. Scotti, F., et al., 39th EPS Conference & 16th Int. Congress on Plasma Physics, Stockholm,", "paper. P4.031.", "[17]. Wagner, F., et al., Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 52 (2010) 124044."]}
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts