Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Prospective Assessment of the Clinic-Demographic Profile and Risk Factors of Diabetic Foot

Authors: Shanker Bharti; Anjani Kumar Anjan; Rajesh Narayan;

A Prospective Assessment of the Clinic-Demographic Profile and Risk Factors of Diabetic Foot

Abstract

AbstractAim: The objective of the present study was to assess association between socio-demographic, behavioural andclinical risk factors and diabetic foot and response of patients to various treatment modalities.Methods: A prospective study was conducted in the General Surgery Department of Bhagwan Mahavir instituteof medical science, Pawapuri, Nalanda, Bihar, India for 7 months. 50 patients were included in the study. Allpatients who presented to surgical outpatient department or were admitted to the surgical wards with signs andsymptoms of diabetic foot during the 7 months period were included.Results: Out of 50 patients in our study, 20 (40%) were in the age group of 51-60 years followed by 13 (26%)in the age group 61-70 years. There was a male preponderance in our study with 36 (72%) patients out of 50.Majority of the study subjects were literate with overall literacy rate being 60%. 96% study subjects belonged tolow class. Among the 50 patients, 13 (26%) were unmarried showing lack of support and care and rest (74%)were married. Labourers accounted for 34% of study participants, farmers constituted 30%, businessmen 18%and others 18% of study subjects. Most of the participants had type II diabetes for >10 years. 80% of studyparticipants had family history of diabetes. 92% of study participants were overweight (BMI 25-29.9) andremaining 8% were obese (BMI ≥30). Hypertension was present in 72% of study participants, ischemic heartdisease in 60% and hypercholesterolemia in 70%.Conclusion: Diabetic foot is a common complication of long-standing diabetes. Several socio-demographicfactors like advancing age, low socio-economic status, lack of family support, occupations involving risk oftrauma to foot contribute to the risk of developing diabetic foot in diabetics. Hence it is essential to educate allthe diabetic patients at risk about good glycemic control, risk factors, proper foot care, periodic foot examinationand neurological examination of lower limbs, prompt treatment of foot lesions and regular follow-up.

AbstractAim: The objective of the present study was to assess association between socio-demographic, behavioural andclinical risk factors and diabetic foot and response of patients to various treatment modalities.Methods: A prospective study was conducted in the General Surgery Department of Bhagwan Mahavir instituteof medical science, Pawapuri, Nalanda, Bihar, India for 7 months. 50 patients were included in the study. Allpatients who presented to surgical outpatient department or were admitted to the surgical wards with signs andsymptoms of diabetic foot during the 7 months period were included.Results: Out of 50 patients in our study, 20 (40%) were in the age group of 51-60 years followed by 13 (26%)in the age group 61-70 years. There was a male preponderance in our study with 36 (72%) patients out of 50.Majority of the study subjects were literate with overall literacy rate being 60%. 96% study subjects belonged tolow class. Among the 50 patients, 13 (26%) were unmarried showing lack of support and care and rest (74%)were married. Labourers accounted for 34% of study participants, farmers constituted 30%, businessmen 18%and others 18% of study subjects. Most of the participants had type II diabetes for >10 years. 80% of studyparticipants had family history of diabetes. 92% of study participants were overweight (BMI 25-29.9) andremaining 8% were obese (BMI ≥30). Hypertension was present in 72% of study participants, ischemic heartdisease in 60% and hypercholesterolemia in 70%.Conclusion: Diabetic foot is a common complication of long-standing diabetes. Several socio-demographicfactors like advancing age, low socio-economic status, lack of family support, occupations involving risk oftrauma to foot contribute to the risk of developing diabetic foot in diabetics. Hence it is essential to educate allthe diabetic patients at risk about good glycemic control, risk factors, proper foot care, periodic foot examinationand neurological examination of lower limbs, prompt treatment of foot lesions and regular follow-up.

Keywords

: Diabetes foot, Socio-demographic factors, Wagner's classification.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average