Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
HAL Sorbonne Université
Report . 2023
License: CC BY SA
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

D1.6 Intermediate validation reports for pilots TONALITIES, TUNES, MUSICBO and CHILD 1st version

Authors: Guillotel-Nothmann, Christophe; Gurrieri, Marco; Festus, Chukwudi; Filaber, Adam; Kranenburg, Van, Peter; Marzi, Eleonora; Graciotti, Arianna;

D1.6 Intermediate validation reports for pilots TONALITIES, TUNES, MUSICBO and CHILD 1st version

Abstract

Polifonia is driven by 10 pilot studies1 that interact with and address the preservation, management, and study of musical heritage (MH)2. Focused on real-world music cases – such as Italian bell heritage, organs in the Netherlands, access to musical heritage for deaf people, and the identification of recurring melodic patterns – these pilots provide a means to validate Polifonia’s computational solutions; to strengthen the project’s outreach; and to integrate new scenarios, early-adopters and stakeholders. They are developed by interdisciplinary teams of researchers from the humanities and social sciences, and from computer science. This deliverable focuses on the mid-term validation of the four pilots that deal with the study of musical heritage: Tonalities3, Tunes4, MusicBo5, and Child6. It is a first step in the pilot validation process which will culminate in the D1.8 deliverable at the end of the project at M407. The main objectives at this stage are to a) present the individual pilot’s validation protocols; b) apply these protocols and present the results obtained so far; and, c) identify the lessons learned from the mid- term validation and address the avenues to be developed, strengthened, and reconsidered in view of the final validation. The validation protocols were designed on the basis of a shared validation framework8 developed in connection with WP5 and presented in detail in the second version of Polifonia’s socio-technical Roadmap at M18 (D1.2)9. This validation framework aims to ensure that: O1: The pilot objectives reflect concrete needs expressed by the target communities and contribute to the state of the art; O2: the methods and approaches are sound; O3: the data on which the pilots are based are of sufficient quality to achieve the desired objectives; O4: the objectives and results expressed are achieved; O5: the resources, methods, and tools provided are made explicit and integrated into the Polifonia Ecosystem, interconnected through the PON and conveyed through the Web portal. The Validation framework is modular in nature. It includes core criteria with which all pilots must comply and specific validation methods for individual pilots or pilot groups.

Country
France
Keywords

[SHS] Humanities and Social Sciences

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green