Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2005
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2005
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2005
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Pteropodidae Gray 1821

Authors: Wilson, Don E.; Reeder, DeeAnn;

Pteropodidae Gray 1821

Abstract

Pteropodidae Gray 1821 Pteropodidae Gray 1821, London Med. Repos., 15: 299. Synonyms: Cephalotidae Gray 1821; Harpyidae H. Smith 1842. Genera: 42 genera with 186 species: Genus Acerodon Jourdan 1837 (5 species with 10 subspecies) Genus Aethalops Thomas 1923 (2 species with 3 subspecies) Genus Alionycteris Kock 1969 (1 species) Genus Aproteles Menzies 1977 (1 species) Genus Balionycteris Matschie 1899 (1 species with 2 subspecies) Genus Casinycteris Thomas 1910 (1 species) Genus Chironax K. Andersen 1912 (1 species with 2 subspecies) Genus Cynopterus F. Cuvier 1824 (7 species with 24 subspecies) Genus Dobsonia Palmer 1898 (14 species with 6 subspecies) Genus Dyacopterus K. Andersen 1912 (2 species) Genus Eidolon Rafinesque 1815 (2 species with 3 subspecies) Genus Eonycteris Dobson 1873 (3 species with 4 subspecies) Genus Epomophorus Bennett 1835 (8 species with 2 subspecies) Genus Epomops Gray 1870 (3 species) Genus Haplonycteris Lawrence 1939 (1 species) Genus Harpyionycteris Thomas 1896 (2 species with 2 subspecies) Genus Hypsignathus H. Allen 1861 (1 species) Genus Latidens Thonglongya 1972 (1 species) Genus Lissonycteris K. Andersen 1912 (1 species with 5 subspecies) Genus Macroglossus F. Cuvier 1824 (2 species with 6 subspecies) Genus Megaerops Peters 1865 (4 species with 2 subspecies) Genus Megaloglossus Pagenstecher 1885 (1 species) Genus Melonycteris Dobson 1877 (3 species with 6 subspecies) Genus Micropteropus Matschie 1899 (2 species) Genus Myonycteris Matschie 1899 (3 species) Genus Nanonycteris Matschie 1899 (1 species) Genus Neopteryx Hayman 1946 (1 species) Genus Notopteris Gray 1859 (2 species) Genus Nyctimene Borkhausen 1797 (15 species with 15 subspecies) Genus Otopteropus Kock 1969 (1 species) Genus Paranyctimene Tate 1942 (2 species with 2 subspecies) Genus Penthetor K. Andersen 1912 (1 species) Genus Plerotes K. Andersen 1910 (1 species) Genus Ptenochirus Peters 1861 (2 species) Genus Pteralopex Thomas 1888 (5 species) Genus Pteropus Brisson 1762 (65 species with 88 subspecies) Genus Rousettus Gray 1821 (10 species with 14 subspecies) Genus Scotonycteris Matschie 1894 (2 species with 3 subspecies) Genus Sphaerias Miller 1906 (1 species) Genus Styloctenium Matschie 1899 (1 species) Genus Syconycteris Matschie 1899 (3 species with 7 subspecies) Genus Thoopterus Matschie 1899 (1 species) Discussion: Various workers have recognized between two and six subfamilies of Pteropodidae including: Cynopterinae Andersen, 1912, Epomophorinae K. Andersen, 1912, Harpionycterinae Miller, 1907, Nyctimeninae Miller, 1907, Macroglossinae Gray, 1866, Rousettinae Andersen, 1912, and Pteropodinae Gray, 1821 (Bergmans, 1997; Corbet and Hill, 1980, 1992; Hill and Smith, 1984; Koopman, 1993, 1994; McKenna and Bell, 1997). Recent phylogenetic studies agree that Macroglossinae and Pteropodinae sensu Koopman (1993, 1994) and McKenna and Bell (1997) are not monophyletic (Alvarez et al., 1999; Giannini and Simmons, 2003; Hollar and Springer, 1997; Hood, 1989; Juste et al., 1997; Kirsch et al., 1995; Romagnoli and Springer, 2000; Springer et al., 1995). Monophyly of cynopterines and empomophorines has also been questioned (Alvarez et al., 1999; Hollar and Springer, 1997; Kirsch et al., 1995; Romagnoli and Springer, 2000). Instead of supporting traditional taxonomic groupings, phylogenetic studies based on DNA hybridization and DNA sequences have found support for a large clade of endemic African taxa including genera previously placed in several different subfamilies/tribes (Alvarez et al., 1999; Giannini and Simmons, 2003; Hollar and Springer, 1997; Kirsch et al., 1995; Romagnoli and Springer, 2000). Relationships among pteropodid genera are not yet fully resolved, however, and questions remain concerning the position of Nyctimene, Paranyctimene, Eidolon, and several SE Asian endemic genera. Existing subfamilial and tribal classifications are not adequately congruent with recent phylogenies. Accordingly, no subfamilial or tribal groups are recognized here pending a thorough reevaluation of pteropodid classification.

Published as part of Wilson, Don E. & Reeder, DeeAnn, 2005, Order Chiroptera - Family Pteropodidae, pp. 313-350 in Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1, Baltimore :The Johns Hopkins University Press on page 313, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7316519

Keywords

Chiroptera, Mammalia, Animalia, Biodiversity, Chordata, Pteropodidae, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities