{"references": ["A. Avi\u017eienis, J.C. Laprie and B. Randell, \"Fundamental Concepts of Dependability\", UCLA CSD Report no. 010028, LAAS Report no. 01-145, Newcastle University Report no. CS-TR-739, 2011.", "F. R. Chevreau, \"Safety culture as a rational myth: Why developing safety culture implies engineering resilience\", in Proc. of the second resilience engineering symposium, Antibes-Juan Les-Pins (France), 2006.", "A. Villemeur, S\u00fbret\u00e9 de fonctionnement des syst\u00e8mes industriels, Eyrolles, 1988.", "F. Monchy, Maintenance. M\u00e9thodes et organisation, Dunod, 2000.", "G. Zwingelstein, \"Evaluation de la criticit\u00e9 des \u00e9quipements- M\u00e9thodes analytiques\", Techniques de l'ing\u00e9nieur, SE 4005, 2014.", "I. Elyasi-Komari, A. Gorbenko, V. Kharchenko and A. Mamalis, \"Analysis of Computer Network Reliability and Criticality: Technique and Features\", International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences, 4, 2011, pp. 720-726.", "M. Rausand and A. H\u00f8yland, System reliability theory. Wiley & Sons, 2004.", "C. Cremona, Structural Performance: Probability-Based Assessment. Wiley-ISTE, 2012.", "S. Kitazawa, K. Okayama, Y. Neyatani, F. Sagot, D. Houtte, L. Abadie, I. Yonekawa, A. Wallander and W.D Klotz, \"RAMI analysis of ITER CODAC\", Fusion Engineering and Design, 87(7-8), 2012, pp. 1510-1513.\n[10]\tC. Ma, Z. Gao and L. Yang, \"Safety analysis of airbone weather radar based on failure mode, effects and critically Analysis\", Procedia Engineering, 17, 2011, pp. 407-414.\n[11]\tA. Yazdani, S. Shariati and A. Yazdani-Chamzini, \"A risk assessment model based on fuzzy logic for electricity distribution system asset management\", Decision Science Letters, 3(3), 2014, pp. 343-352.\n[12]\tReliasoft, \"Examining Risk Priority Numbers in FMEA\", Reliability Edge Home, 4 (1), 1, 2003, pp. 14-16.\n[13]\tN. Sellappan and K. Palanikumar, \"Modified Prioritization Methodology for Risk Priority Number in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis\", International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 3 (4), 2013, pp. 27-36.\n[14]\tP. Veras, P. Scherer, F. Silva, P.R.S. Barros and V.A. Santiago Junior, \"FMEA as a Design Improvement Tool of protoMIRAX Attitude Control Subsystem,\" in LADC'2013, 2013, Rio de Janeiro (Brazil). \n[15]\tMIL-STD, Procedures for Performing a Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis. MIL-STD 1629A, Military Standard, U.S. Department of Defense, 1980. \n[16]\tK. Jenab and J. Pineau, \"Failure mode and effect analysis on safety critical components of space travel\", Management Science Letters, 5(7), 2015, pp. 669-678.\n[17]\tJ. Karvo, A study of teletraffic problems in multicast networks. Dissertation for the degree of doctor of science in technology, University of Technology, Helsinki (Finland), 2002.\n[18]\tJ.W. Bryant, \"Function Analysis Systems Techniques: the basics\", Monograph of the SAVE International, The value society, 1999.\n[19]\tF. Arnal, Optimisation de la fiabilit\u00e9 pour des communications multicast par satellite g\u00e9ostationnaire. PhD Thesis, Ecole Nationale Sup\u00e9rieure des T\u00e9l\u00e9communications, Paris (France), 2004. \n[20]\tM. Noureddine and S. Benhabib, \"Performance et fiabilit\u00e9 des syst\u00e8mes de communication multipoints\", in Proc. of the 10\u00e8me Congr\u00e8s International de G\u00e9nie Industriel (CIGI2013), La Rochelle (France), 2013.\n[21]\tN. Hadjioui, C. Habchi and M. Noureddine, Criticit\u00e9 des d\u00e9faillances dans les applications multipoints. Master Project in Computer Science, University of Sciences and Technology of Oran (Algeria), 2011."]}

Following the current economic challenges and competition, all systems, whatever their field, must be efficient and operational during their activity. In this context, it is imperative to anticipate, identify, eliminate and estimate the failures of systems, which may lead to an interruption of their function. This need requires the management of possible risks, through an assessment of the failures criticality following a dependability approach. On the other hand, at the time of new information technologies and considering the networks field evolution, the data transmission has evolved towards a multipoint communication, which can simultaneously transmit information from a sender to multiple receivers. This article proposes the failures criticality assessment of a multipoint communication network, integrates a database of network failures and their quantifications. The proposed approach is validated on a case study and the final result allows having the criticality matrix associated with failures on the considered network, giving the identification of acceptable risks.