Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Appendisotoma sibirica Stebayeva 1985

Authors: Potapov, Mikhail; Babenko, Anatoly; Bu, Yun; Bayartogtokh, Badamdorj; Gulgenova, Ayuna; Luan, Yun-Xia;

Appendisotoma sibirica Stebayeva 1985

Abstract

Appendisotoma sibirica Stebaeva, 1985 Figs 43–59, 64 Material: Winter form. Russia, West Siberia, Kemerovo Region, 10 km SE from Mezdurechensk, left bank of Tom’ River, Kuznetsky Alatau Ridge, mountain taiga, under Abies sibirica, 18.10.1981, leg. S.S. (holotype and 6 paratypes). Kemerovo Region, nearby Kuzedeevo, Biyskaya Griva Ridge (Altai Mts.), mixed forest (Abies, Tilia), 16– 17.09.1994, leg. O. Berezina. Summer form: Russia, West Siberia, Kemerovo Region, Salair Ridge, Mixed forest (Abies, Pinus, Populus), litter, 10.10.2020, leg. N. Kuznetsova and М.P., N 54.2681 E 85.42581 (mixed with winter form). Tomsk Region, ~ 10 km W from Tomsk, Timiryazev forestry, litter under Pinus sibirica, 23.08.1984, leg. N. Kuznetsova and М.P. Description. No less than 1.3 mm (for the largest known subadult individual). Corpus stout (Fig. 55). Greyish blue, spotty, not very dark. Abd.V separated from Abd.IV and fused with Abd. VI. Cuticle with thin hexagonal primary granulation, coarser at posterior edges of body tergites. Ocelli 8+8 (Figs 58, 59), G and H smaller. Ratio PAO length: ocellus = 1.2–1.5. PAO ca 0.4 as long as width of Ant.I and much shorter than inner unguis length (0.5– 0.7). Maxillary head with unmodified lamellae. Maxillary outer lobe with 4 sublobal hairs, maxillary palp bifurcate. Labrum with 4 well visible sharp apical fields. Labral formula as 4/5,5,4. Labium with 5 usual papillae (А–Е) and labial formula A1, B4, C0, D4, E7 (16 guards at whole), guard chaetae e7 present, with 4 proximal (Fig. 45), 4 basomedian and 5 basolateral chaetae. Ventral side of head with 4+4 chaetae.Ant.I with 16–17 common chaetae (11 of basal set and 5–6 additional ones), 3–4 s-chaetae (one in more proximal position shorter) and 5 bms-chaetae, 3 dorsal and 2 ventral. Ant.II with 1 latero-distal s and 5 bms (2 dorsal set together, 2 ventral and 1 additional). Ant.III with 1 bms and 6 distal s (including 2 lateral), without additional s-chaetae (Fig. 49). S-chaetae on Ant. IV weakly differentiated. Organite small, micro s-chaeta of common shape. Common chaetae smooth or weakly serrated. S-formula 4,4/3,3,3,4,6 (s), 1,0/0,0,1 (ms) (Fig. 43). Th. II and III with 2 and 3 accp-s-chaetae in p-row, respectively (Fig. 50). Tergal s-chaetae short (Fig. 44). All accp-s-chaetae on Th.II and III and Abd.I, II, and III situated in p-row, on Abd. IV behind p-row (Figs 50, 44). Abd. IV often with 1–2 common chaetae set between accp-s-chaetae. Four s-chaetae on Abd. V set in one posterior transversal row, two in front position (Fig. 44). Macrochaetae 2,2/3,3,3,3 in number, head, Th.II and III with some additional macrochaetae-like chaetae (Fg. 51). Macrochaetae long and straight, on Abd.V 2.1–2.3 times longer than dens and 5.0–6.3 times longer than mucro. Foil chaetae at the tip of abdomen absent. Axial chaetotaxy of Th.II–Abd.IV as 6,4/2,2,2,3. Posterior side of body with fewer microchaetae (Figs 53, 44). In comparison with oligochaetotic corpus, head appears polychaetotic (Fig. 52). Thoracic segments without ventral chaetae. Unguis with large lateral and weak or missing inner teeth (Fig. 46). Empodial appendage 0.6–0.7 as long as unguis. Tibiotarsi with 4 T-chaetae (at whole with 11 chaetae in apical whorl, Fig. 46). Tibiotarsi with many additional chaetae (>28 chaetae at whole). Tibiotarsal tenent hairs pointed or with blunt tips, 1.0–1.2 as long as length of inner edge of unguis (probably affected by cyclomorphosis). Ventral tube with 4+4 (more rarely 3+3, as in first description) laterodistal chaetae, with uncommon arrangement: 2 anterior chaetae set together (Fig. 47). Posterior side of ventral tube with 5 chaetae (2 in distal transversal row and 3 proximal), anteriorly without chaetae. Tenaculum with 3+3 teeth (4+ 4 in two individuals of "summer" form) and 2 (rarely 1) chaeta. Anterior furcal subcoxa with 17–20, posterior one with 10–11 chaetae. Anterior side of manubrium with 3+3, 1+1 or 2+2, 1+1 chaetae (often asymmetrically 2+3, 1+1) (Figs 48, 56, 57), posterior side with many chaetae, with 2+2 or 1+1 latero-central chaetae. Dens smooth or with weak notches on posterior side, with 6 anterior chaetae. Posterior side of dens with 5 chaetae (Figs 48, 56, 57). Outer external lobe near apex of dens present or absent (cyclomorphosis). Mucro with 3 teeth. Ratio manubrium: dens: mucro = 4.4–5.4: 2.3–3.0: 1. Males present, but adult stage not found, therefore presence of differentiated spurs on Leg III and antennae is unknown. Cyclomorphosis. In October the population from Salair Ridge had specimens with and without external lobe on dens, which appeared to be winter and summer forms, respectively (Figs 57, 56). Winter individuals showed enlarged cornea of ocelli (Fig. 59 vs 58). Tenaculum is possibly affected by cyclomorphosis (3+3 or 4+4 teeth). To confirm the cyclomorphosis of A. sibirica and to find more detail differences between the seasonal forms, additional material is necessary. Remarks. In Palearctic region, A. sibirica resembles A. absoloni Rusek, 1966 (Europe) in chaetotaxy of furca and long macrochaetae on body. To supplement the description of the latter species, we studied one subadult specimen of A. absoloni from Czechia (Suchý žleb, Moravian karst, 3.VIII.1960, det. J. Rusek) and several adults from south-eastern part of European Russia (Middle Volga, Samarskaya Luka NP, Zhiguli Mts, at quarry, Verblyud Mt., 02.05.2010, coll. Y. Shveenkova), corresponding to original description. The Czech and Russian individuals belonged to summer form (apical lobe absent). Appendisotoma sibirica and A. absoloni share several unique characters for the genus: s- and ms-formulas (4,4/3,3,3,4,6; 1,0/0,0,1), increased number of s- and bms-chaetae on Ant.I, bifurcate maxillary palp, 4 chaetae on proximal field of labium, long body macrochaetae, and other characters (Table 1). Appendisotoma sibirica differs from A. absoloni by fewer chaetae on anterior side of manubrium (3–4+3–4 vs. 5+5) and fewer chaetae in axial group on Abd.I and II (2+2 vs 3+3: Figs 53 vs 54). A. absoloni has variable axial set (2+2–3+3) on Abd. III (additional pair encircled in Fig. 54). Appendisotoma sibirica has longer macrochaetae, ratio Mac: dens = 2.1–2.2 (vs. 1.4–1.7), Mac: mucro = 5.0–6.7 (vs. 3.5–4.1). Summer specimens of A. absoloni lack apical lobe on dens, like in A. sibirica. After Fjellberg (2007), A. abiskoensis (Agrell, 1939) has similar s-formula (4,4/3,3,3,3,5) and 4 chaetae on proximal field of labium (based on our data). However, Appendisotoma sibirica and A. abiskoensis are well separated considering other characters. Appendisotoma sibirica has possibly more closely related congeners, but the characters mentioned above are poorly studied in the genus. Distribution and ecology. The species is distributed in the taiga forests of southwestern mountain ridges and nearby lowland of Siberia (Salair Ridge, Kuznetsky Alatau Ridge, north of Altai Mts: Biyskaya Griva Ridge, Tomsk). It is a rare, local endemic species (Fig. 64).

Published as part of Potapov, Mikhail, Babenko, Anatoly, Bu, Yun, Bayartogtokh, Badamdorj, Gulgenova, Ayuna & Luan, Yun-Xia, 2024, Taxonomy of the Cryptopygus complex. IV. Cyclomorphosis in three species of Appendisotoma and description of a new species from Kazakhstan (Collembola, Isotomidae), pp. 487-510 in Zootaxa 5453 (4) on pages 501-507, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5453.4.2, http://zenodo.org/record/11239671

Keywords

Arthropoda, Animalia, Collembola, Appendisotoma sibirica, Biodiversity, Entomobryomorpha, Isotomidae, Taxonomy, Appendisotoma

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities