Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

A Prospective Study on Evaluation of Patient and Physician Satisfaction Regarding Aesthetic Results in Rhinoplasty Procedures

Authors: Onkar Dew; Vidyapati Choudhary;

A Prospective Study on Evaluation of Patient and Physician Satisfaction Regarding Aesthetic Results in Rhinoplasty Procedures

Abstract

Background: Rhinoplasty is a popular surgical procedure aimed at enhancing nasal aesthetics and functionality. Evaluating patient and surgeon satisfaction with rhinoplasty outcomes is crucial for assessing the procedure’s success. Factors influencing satisfaction and potential disparities between patients and surgeons need investigation to improve surgical techniques and patient experiences. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. Participants met inclusion criteria (age 18-35, no prior rhinoplasty, no major health or psychological issues). Standardized questionnaires collected data on demographics and satisfaction. Data analysis used SPSS 18.0, with significance set at 0.05. Results: Gender impacted patient satisfaction with nostril outcomes one month after rhinoplasty (female: 29%, male: 17%). Younger patients (<25 years) expressed higher satisfaction with nasal width (56%) and general satisfaction (50%) than older patients (32%) three months post-surgery. Single patients showed greater satisfaction (80%) with middle-lower nose display than married patients (60%) three months after surgery. Patients without a high school diploma reported higher satisfaction one month post-rhinoplasty, especially regarding nasal hump, middle-lower nose display, nose proportions, and general satisfaction. Surgeon satisfaction increased after three months, while patients reported elevated satisfaction, particularly regarding aesthetic factors, but lower general satisfaction compared to surgeons. Conclusion: Rhinoplasty outcomes vary by gender, age, marital status, and educational level. Tailored care strategies are needed to enhance patient experiences and satisfaction. Recommendations: Surgeons should consider demographic factors when discussing rhinoplasty outcomes with patients. Preoperative counseling and managing expectations can improve patient satisfaction. Further research can explore additional variables influencing rhinoplasty satisfaction.

Background: Rhinoplasty is a popular surgical procedure aimed at enhancing nasal aesthetics and functionality. Evaluating patient and surgeon satisfaction with rhinoplasty outcomes is crucial for assessing the procedure’s success. Factors influencing satisfaction and potential disparities between patients and surgeons need investigation to improve surgical techniques and patient experiences. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. Participants met inclusion criteria (age 18-35, no prior rhinoplasty, no major health or psychological issues). Standardized questionnaires collected data on demographics and satisfaction. Data analysis used SPSS 18.0, with significance set at 0.05. Results: Gender impacted patient satisfaction with nostril outcomes one month after rhinoplasty (female: 29%, male: 17%). Younger patients (<25 years) expressed higher satisfaction with nasal width (56%) and general satisfaction (50%) than older patients (32%) three months post-surgery. Single patients showed greater satisfaction (80%) with middle-lower nose display than married patients (60%) three months after surgery. Patients without a high school diploma reported higher satisfaction one month post-rhinoplasty, especially regarding nasal hump, middle-lower nose display, nose proportions, and general satisfaction. Surgeon satisfaction increased after three months, while patients reported elevated satisfaction, particularly regarding aesthetic factors, but lower general satisfaction compared to surgeons. Conclusion: Rhinoplasty outcomes vary by gender, age, marital status, and educational level. Tailored care strategies are needed to enhance patient experiences and satisfaction. Recommendations: Surgeons should consider demographic factors when discussing rhinoplasty outcomes with patients. Preoperative counseling and managing expectations can improve patient satisfaction. Further research can explore additional variables influencing rhinoplasty satisfaction.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Rhinoplasty, patient satisfaction, surgeon satisfaction, demographics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?