
Nancy Fraser’s theories on redistribution and recognition are highly influential in the current discourse of social justice due to the comprehensive and complex nature of intersectionality and justice. Although Fraser’s framework provides insightful information, it does not provides a thorough understanding of interpersonal dynamics. In contrast, this is provided by Axel Honneth’s conception of Justice that incorporates social spheres like love, legal rights, and respect. In this paper, I aim to provide an alternative framework that incorporates important elements of both Fraser’s and Honneth’s concepts. By synthesizing both concepts, we would be provided with a better understanding and a holistic perspective of social justice. I argue that addressing the dual perspectives of material conditions of oppression and symbolic aspects of misrecognition is essential.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
