
Gender disparities persist in academia, particularly in senior leadership positions, despite a growing number of women earning PhDs. To address this, MINDtheGEPs offers specialised training for influential roles in decision-making bodies and committees (e.g. Rectors, V-ce Rectors, Chancellors, Deans, V-ce Deans, Directors, administrative and research team leaders, managerial staff at non-academic RPOs). This training aims to raise awareness of gender imbalances, challenge preconceived notions, and explore solutions. It focuses on breaking gender stereotypes in selection processes and addressing unconscious gender biases in evaluating merit and excellence. This brief is based on a MINDtheGEPs deliverable, which in turn is based on a combination of desk research, our expertise, partners’ experiences, and existing guidelines. This deliverable includes a set of overall recommendations supporting academic and non-academic organisations to foster the awareness of gender issues in the field of recruitment, retention and career progression. Our guidelines on planned actions are developed to help to understand and prepare organisational change, which should improve gender equality in any institution.
Gender Equity, MINDtheGEPs, Gender inequality, stereotypes, Gender equality plans, Women's studies, Gender equality, Leadership, Gender mainstreaming, Gender issue, GEPs, Gender studies
Gender Equity, MINDtheGEPs, Gender inequality, stereotypes, Gender equality plans, Women's studies, Gender equality, Leadership, Gender mainstreaming, Gender issue, GEPs, Gender studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
