Downloads provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["K. Shamsi.\"Effect of sowing date and row spacing on yield and yield\ncomponents of chickpea under rain fed conditions in Iran\". Journal of\nApplied Biosciences. 2009, pp. 941-947.", "A. Sadeghi, K. Cheghamirza, H.R. Dorri HR. \"The study of\nmorphoagronomic traits relationship in common bean (Phaseolus\nvulgaris L.)\". Biharean Biologist. 2011, pp. 102-108.", "N. Kayan, M. Sait Adak. \"Associations of some characters with grain\nyield in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)\". Pakistan Journal of Botany.\n2012. Pp. 267-272.", "R. Taleb, F. Fayaz, N.A. Jelodar NA. \"Correlation and path coefficient\nanalysis of yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L)\nunder dry land condition in the west of Iran\". Asian Journal of Plant\nScience. 2007, pp. 1151-1154.", "Y. Derya, A.E. \"Anlarsal. Performance of some winter chickpea (Cicer\narietinum L.) genotypes in mediterranean conditions\". Notulae\nBotanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2008, pp. 35-41.", "J.E. Board, Q. Tan. \"Assimilatory capacity effects on soybean yield\ncomponents and pod number\". Crop Science. 1995, pp- 846-851.", "AOAC. In K. Helrich (Ed.), Official methods of analysis (15th ed.).\nArlington, VA/Washington, DC, USA: Association of Official\nAnalytical Chemists. 1990.", "M. Zia-Ul-Haq, S. Iqbal, S. Ahmad, M. Imran, A. Niaz, M.I. Bhanger.\n\"Nutritional and compositional study of Desi chickpea (Cicer arietinum\nL.) cultivars grown in Punjab, Pakistan\". Food Chemistry. 2007, pp.\n1357-1363.", "R. Talebi, A. Rokhzadi A. \"Genetic diversity and interrelationships\nbetween agronomic traits in landrace chickpea accessions collected from\n'Kurdistan' province, north-west of Iran\". International Journal of\nAgronomy and Crop Science. 2013, pp. 2203-2209.\n[10] R. Fatehi, R. Taleb, F. Fayyaz. \"Characterization of Iranian Landrace\nWheat Accessions by Inter Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) Markers\".\nJournal of Applied Environment. 2011, pp. 423-436.\n[11] H. Zali, E. Farshadfar, S. Sabaghpour. \"Genetic variability and\ninterrelationships among agronomic traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum\nL.) genotypes\". Crop Breeding Journal. 2011, pp. 127-132.\n[12] H. Zali, E. Farshadfar, S. Sabaghpour. \"Agronomic characteristics and\ngenetic diversity in 17 chickpea genotypes\". Agriculture Research. 2009,\nPp. 169-181."]}
The grain quality of chickpea in Iran is low and instable, which may be attributed to the evolution of cultivars with a narrow genetic base making them vulnerable to biotic stresses. Four chickpea varieties from diverse geographic origins were chosen and arranged in a randomized complete block design. Mesorhizobium sp. cicer strain SW7 was added to all the chickpea seeds. Chickpea seeds were planted on October 9, 2013. Each genotype was sown 5 m in length, with 35 cm inter-row spacing, in 3 rows. Weeds were removed manually in all plots. Results showed that Analysis of variance on the studied traits showed significant differences among genotypes for N, P, K and Fe contents of chickpea, but there is not a significant difference among Ca, Zn and Mg continents of chickpea. The experimental coefficient of variation (CV) varied from 7.3 to 15.8. In general, the CV value lower than 20% is considered to be good, indicating the accuracy of conducted experiments. The highest grain N was observed in Hashem and Jam cultivars. The highest grain P was observed in Jam cultivar. Phosphorus content (mg/100g) ranged from 142.3 to 302.3 with a mean value of 221.3. The negative correlation (-0.126) was observed between the N and P of chickpea cultivars. The highest K and Fe contents were observed in Jam cultivar.
yield., genotype, nutrient, Cultivar, nitrogen
yield., genotype, nutrient, Cultivar, nitrogen
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 13 | |
| downloads | 8 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts