Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

CAPABLE D8.8: Report on Health Technology Assessment and Market Regulation

Authors: Ottaviano, Manuel; Quaglini, Silvana; Gabetta, Matteo; Medlock, Stephanie;

CAPABLE D8.8: Report on Health Technology Assessment and Market Regulation

Abstract

The document reports the activities of the Health Technology Assessment and the overall result of the standards and regulations specific to the field of Digital Health. This report has been organized into 2 parts that are summarized below. The first part provides a report on the health technology assessment, following a method proposed by the EU network of HTA (HTA CoreModel) and analyzing the proposed technology from different viewpoints that are: The current clinical context details the clinical problem and the current available solutions and approaches. Description and technical characteristics of the solution shortly present the CAPABLE solution. Safety aspects are described as incidental findings and risks associated with the use of CAPABLE. Clinical effectiveness of the solution, which briefly describes the main result of the clinical study. Cost and economics that depicts the overall costs for the deployment of the solution. Ethical analysis details the solutions that were adopted during the pilot studies to prevent or address any ethical issue. Organizational aspects section details the requirement at an organizational level to uptake the solution. Patients and social aspects section details the burden of patients and caregivers and how a system like CAPABLE is perceived. Legal aspects detail the legal frameworks to be followed in order to use the CAPABLE solution. The second part of the document focuses on the standardization practice considering two levels: Standardization of the information managed by the CAPABLE system. The required standardization following the Medical Device Regulation.

This deliverable is a part of a project receiving funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 875052

Keywords

market regulation, health technology assessment

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average