{"references": ["Aksal, F. A. (2011). Developing evaluative tool for online learning and teaching process. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10( 3), 69-75.", "Altun\u00e7eki\u00e7, A. & Aksu, L. (2011). Web destekli \u00f6\u011frenme ortamlar\u0131n\u0131n internet kullan\u0131m\u0131na y\u00f6nelik tutum d\u00fczeyleri \u00fczerine etkisi. Kastamonu E\u011fitim Dergisi, 19(1), 239-250.", "Altun\u0131\u015f\u0131k, R., Co\u015fkun, R., Bayraktaro\u011flu, S., & Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m, E. (2001). Sosyal bilimlerde ara\u015ft\u0131rma y\u00f6ntemleri. Adapazar\u0131: Sakarya Kitabevi.", "Atam, O. (2006). Olu\u015fturmac\u0131 yakla\u015f\u0131ma dayal\u0131 olarak fen ve teknoloji dersi \u0131s\u0131 - s\u0131cakl\u0131k konusunda haz\u0131rlanan yaz\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n ilk\u00f6\u011fretim 5.s\u0131n\u0131f \u00f6\u011frencilerinin akademik ba\u015far\u0131lar\u0131na ve kal\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011fa etkisi. Yay\u0131mlanmam\u0131\u015f Y\u00fcksek Lisans Tezi, \u00c7ukurova \u00dcniversitesi, Adana, T\u00fcrkiye.", "Batur, Z., Gulveren, H., & Balc\u0131, S. (2013). An empirical work about the attitudes of students receiving education under \"tablet pc pilot practice\" towards use of technology in turkish lectures. European Journal of Educational Studies, 5(1), 29-42.", "Bekta\u015f, C. & Semerci, \u00c7. (2008). \u0130lk\u00f6\u011fretim okullar\u0131nda bilgisayar derslerine ili\u015fkin \u00f6\u011fretmen g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri (Elaz\u0131\u011f ili \u00f6rne\u011fi). F\u0131rat \u00dcniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(1), 195-210.", "Bilici, A., Akdur, T. E., Y\u0131ld\u0131zba\u015f\u0131, A., G\u00fcnday, \u00d6., & \u00c7i\u00e7ek, H. (2011). E\u011fitimde FAT\u0130H Projesinin sa\u011flamas\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen fayda ve sosyal etkileri. 5th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium. 22-24 September, F\u0131rat University, Elaz\u0131\u011f, Turkey.", "Br\u00e5ten, I., Str\u00f8ms\u00f8, H. I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2005). The relationship between Internet-specific epistemological beliefs and learning within Internet technologies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(2), 141\u2013171.", "Delen, E. & Bulut, O. (2011). The relationship between students' exposure to technology and their achievement in science and math. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 311-317.\n[10]\tGuzel, H. (2011). Factors affecting the computer usage of physics teachers working at private training centers, TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 122-132.\n[11]\tHartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2003). The use of comprehension aids in a hypermedia environment: Investigating the impact of metacognitive awareness and epistemological beliefs. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(3), 275\u2013289.\n[12]\tKarasar, N. (2004). Bilimsel ara\u015ft\u0131rma y\u00f6ntemi. (13. Bask\u0131). Ankara: Nobel Yay\u0131nlar\u0131.\n[13]\tKarhan, \u0130. (2007). \u0130lk\u00f6\u011fretim okullar\u0131nda g\u00f6rev yapan \u00f6\u011fretmenlerin epistemolojik inan\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n demografik \u00f6zelliklerine ve bilgi teknolojilerini kullanma durumlar\u0131na g\u00f6re incelenmesi. Yay\u0131mlanmam\u0131\u015f Doktora Tezi, Y\u0131ld\u0131z Teknik \u00dcniversitesi, \u0130stanbul, T\u00fcrkiye.\n[14]\tKeser, H. & \u00c7etinkaya, L. (2013). Problems faced by teachers and students in terms of using interactive boards and suggested solutions related to these problems. Turkish Studies - International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 8(6), 377-403.\n[15]\tKeskink\u0131l\u0131\u00e7, F. E. & Karata\u015f, S. (2011). E\u011fitsel i\u00e7erikli web sitelerinin metin tasar\u0131m unsurlar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan incelenmesi. E\u011fitim Teknolojileri Ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131 Dergisi, 2(1), 35-47.\n[16]\tMEB (Milli E\u011fitim Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131). (2013). E\u011fitimde f\u0131rsatlar\u0131 art\u0131rma teknolojiyi iyile\u015ftirme hareketi projesi (FAT\u0130H). Proje hakk\u0131nda. http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/tr/icerikincele.php?id=6, Eri\u015fim Tarihi: 08.11.2013. \n[17]\t\u00d6nen, A. S. (2012). Effects of educational beliefs on attitudes towards using computer technologies. H. U. Journal of Education, 43, 353-361.\n[18]\tPamuk, S., \u00c7ak\u0131r, R., Ergun, M., Y\u0131lmaz, H. B., & Ayas, C. (2013). The use of tablet PC and interactive board from the perspectives of teachers and students: Evaluation of the FAT\u0130H Project. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(3), 1815-1822.\n[19]\tPapadouris, N. & Constantinou, C. P. (2008). A methodology for integrating computer-based learning tools in science curricula. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(4), 521-538.\n[20]\tSmith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91-101.\n[21]\tSomy\u00fcrek, S., Atasoy, B., & \u00d6zdemir, S. (2009). Board's IQ: What makes a board smart?. Computers & Education, 53(2), 368-374.\n[22]\tStr\u00f8ms\u00f8, H. I., & Br\u00e5ten, I. (2010). The role of personal epistemology in the self-regulation of Internet-based learning . Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 91\u2013111.\n[23]\t\u015eahin, \u0130., Erdo\u011fan, A., & Akt\u00fcrk, A. O. (2007). \u00d6\u011fretmen adaylar\u0131n\u0131n okul uygulamalar\u0131ndan doyumlar\u0131n\u0131 yorday\u0131c\u0131 fakt\u00f6rler. Sel\u00e7uk \u00dcniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstit\u00fcs\u00fc Dergisi, 17, 509\u2013517.\n[24]\tWolcott, H. F. (1990). On seeking-and rejecting-validity in qualitative research. (Ed.) E. W. Eisner, & A. Peshkin Qualititative Inquiry in Education the Coutinuing Debate (pp.121-152), New York: Teachers Collage Press.\n[25]\tY\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m, A. & \u015eim\u015fek, H. (2004). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel ara\u015ft\u0131rma y\u00f6ntemleri. Ankara: Se\u00e7kin Yay\u0131nlar\u0131."]}

This study investigated the views of teachers, students and their parents on the FATIH (Movement of Enhancing Opportunities and Improving Technology) Project, which was put into service by the Ministry of National Education in cooperation with the Ministry of Transportation in Turkey in November 2010 for the purpose of increasing students’ success and planned to be completed within 5 years. The study group consisted of teachers employed in a pilot school in the province of Karaman in central Turkey included within the scope of the FATIH Project, students attending this school and parents whose children are students in that school. The research data were collected through forms developed by the researchers to determine the views of teachers, students and parents on the FATIH Project. The descriptive analysis method, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the study. An analysis of the data revealed that a large majority of the teachers and the students believed that if computers were used to serve their set purpose, then they could make considerable contributions to education. A large majority of the parents, on the other hand, regard the use of computers in education as a great opportunity for the students. The views of the teachers, students and parents on the FATIH Project usually overlap. Most of the participants in the study pointed out that the FATIH Project was intended to use technology effectively in education. Moreover, each individual participant described their role in the FATIH Project in accordance with their relative position and stated that they could perform whatever was expected of them for the effective and efficient use and progress of the Project. The views of the participants regarding the FATIH Project vary according to the kind of the participants.