Downloads provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["", "G. M. Jeanneau, D. Gerentes, X. Foueillassar, M. Zivy, J. Vidal, A.\nToppan, P. Perez, ''Improvement of drought tolerance in maize: towards\nthe functional validation of the Zm-Asr1 gene and increase of water use\nefficiency by over-expressing C4\u2013PEPC'' Biochimie 84, 1127\u20131135,\n2002.", "L. Nazari,H. H. Pakniyat, ''Assessment of drought tolerance in barley\ngenotypes'', J Appl Sci 10(2): 151-156, 2010", "P. Monneveux, C. Sanchez, A. Tiessen, ''Future progress in drought\ntolerance in maize needs new secondary traits and cross combinations'',\nJournal of Agricultural Science 146, 1\u201314, 2008.", "M. Tollenaar, J. Wu, ''Yield in temperate maize is attributable to greater\nstress tolerance.'', Crop Science 39, 1604\u20131897, 1999.", "M. Tollenaar, E.-A Lee, ''Yield stability and stress tolerance in maize'',\nFields Crop Research 75, 161\u2013169, 2002.", "H. Campos, A. Cooper, J.-E. Habben, G.-O. Edmeades, J.-R. Schussler,\n''Improving drought tolerance in maize: a view from industry'', Field\nCrops Research 90, 19\u201334, 2004", "M. Tollenaar, E.-A. Lee, \"Dissection of physiological processes\nunderlying grain yield in maize by examining genetic improvement and\nheterosis\", Maydica 51, pp.399\u2013408, 2006.", "G.-E. Edwards, V.-R. Franceschi, E.-V. Voznesenkaya, ''Single cell C4\nphotosynthesis versus the dual-cell (Kranz) paradigm'', Annual Review\nof Plant Biology 55, 173\u2013196, 2004", "C.-R. Boomsma, J.-B. Santini, M. Tollenaar, T.-J. Vyn, ''Maize\nmorphological responses to intense crowding at low nitrogen\navailability: an analysis and review'', Agron. J. 101:1426\u20131452, 2009.\n[10] Y. Assefa, K.-L. Roozeboom, S.-A. Staggenborg, J. Du, ''Dryland and\nirrigated corn yield with climate, management, and hybrid changes from\n1939 through 2009'', Agron J 104:473\u2013482, 2012\n[11] R.-J. Van Roekel, J.-A. Coulter, ''Agronomic responses of corn to\nplanting date and plant density'', Agron J 103:1414\u20131422, 2011\n[12] I.-S. Tokatlidis, M. Koutsika-Sotiriou, A.-C. Fasoulas, ''The\ndevelopment of density independent maize hybrids'' Maydica 46, 21\u2013\n25, 2001.\n[13] I.-S. Tokatlidis, C. Tsikrikoni, A.-S. Lithourgidis, J.-T. Tsialtas, C.\nTzantarmas, ''Intra-cultivar variation in cotton: response to singleplant\nyield selection at low density'', J Agric Sci 149:197\u2013204, 2011\n[14] L. Sangoi, M.-A. Gracietti, C. Rampazzo, P. Bianchetti, ''Response of\nBrazilian maize hybrids from different eras to changes in plant\npopulation'' Field Crops Res. 79, 39\u201351, 2002.\n[15] D.-A. Fasoula, V.-A Fasoula, ''Competitive ability and plant breeding'',\nPlant Breed Rev 14:89\u2013138, 1997a.\n[16] V.-A. Fasoula, D.-A Fasoula, ''Principles underlying genetic\nimprovement for high and stable crop yield potential'', Field Crop Res\n75:191\u2013209, 2002.\n[17] I.S. Tokatlidis, V. Has, I. Mylonas, I. Has, G Evgenidis, V. Melidis, A.\nCopandean, E. Ninou, ''Density effects on environmental variance and\nexpected response to selection in maize (Zea mays L.)'', Euphytica\n174:283\u2013291, 2010a.\n[18] A.-C. Fasoulas , V.-A. Fasoula , ''Honeycomb selection Designs'', Plant\nBreed Rev 13:87\u2013139, 1995.\n[19] V.-A. Fasoula, ''Selection of high yielding plants belonging to entries of\nhigh homeostasis maximizes efficiency in maize breeding'', XXI\nInternational Conference in Maize and Sorgum Breeding in the\nGenomics Era, Bergamo, Italy, p 28, 21\u201324 June 2009.\n[20] D.-L. Sparks, A.-L. Page, P.-A. Helmke, R.-H. Leoppert, P.-N.\nSoltanpour, M.-A. Tabatabai, G.-T. Johnston, M.-E. Sumner, ''Methods\nof soil analysis'', Soil Science Society of American, Madison,\nWisconsin, USA, 1996.\n[21] I. Rajcan, L.-M. Dwyer, M. Tollenaar, ''Note on relationship between\nleaf soluble carbohydrate and chlorophyll concentrations in maize during\nleaf senescence'', Field Crops Res. 63:13\u201317, 1999.\n[22] J.-T. Tsialtas, D. Baxevanos, N. Maslaris, ''SPAD, LAI and their\nStability as Assessments of Yield and Quality in Sugar Beet (Beta\nvulgaris L.) Cultivars Grown in two Contrasting Environments'', Crop\nScience, to be published.\n[23] W. Yan, M.-S. Kang. ''GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for\nBreeders'', Geneticists and Agronomists, 1st ed., CRC Press LLC, Boca\nRaton, 2003.\n[24] N. Zialdi, M. Brassard, G. B\u00e9langer, A. Claessens, N. Tremblay, A.-N.\nCambouris, M.-C. Nolin, L.-\u00c9. Parent, ''Chlorophyll Measurements and\nNitrogen Nutrition Index for the Evaluation of Corn Nitrogen Status'',\nAgron. J. 100:1264\u20131273, 2008.\n[25] N. Ziadi , G. B\u00e9langer, A. Claessens, L. Lefebvre, N. Tremblay, A.-N.\nCambouris, M.-C. Nolin, L.-\u00c9. Parent, ''Plant-Based Diagnostic Tools\nfor Evaluating Wheat Nitrogen Status'', Crop Sci. 50(S6):S2580-S2590,\n2010.\n[26] A.-K. Shukla, J.-K. Ladha,V.-K. Singh, B.-S. Dwivedi, V.\nBalasubramanian, R.-K. Gupta, S.-K. Sharma, Y. Singh, H. Pathak, P.-S.\nPandey, A.-T. Padre, R.-L. Yadav, ''Calibrating the Leaf Color Chart for\nNitrogen Management in Different Genotypes of Rice and Wheat in a\nSystems Perspective'', Agron. J. 96:1606\u20131621, 2004.\n[27] C. Dordas, A.-S. Lithourgidis, T. Matsi, N. Barbayiannis, ''Application\nof Liquid Cattle Manure and Inorganic Fertilizers Affect Dry Matter,\nNitrogen Accumulation, and Partitioning in Maize'', Nutrient Cycling in\nAgroecosystems 80 (3), 283-296, 2008.\n[28] C. Dordas, C. Sioulas, ''Safflower yield, chlorophyll content,\nphotosynthesis, and water use efficiency response to nitrogen\nfertilization under rainfed conditions'', Industrial Crops and Products.\n27: 75-85, 2008.\n[29] A.-A. Fleming, J.-H. Palmer, ''Variation in chlorophyll content in maize\nlines and hybrids'', Crop Sci. 15:617\u2013620. 1975.\n[30] G. Wang, M.-S. Kang, O. Moreno, ''Genetic analyses of grain-filling\nrate and duration in maize'', Field Crops Res. 61:211\u2013222, 1999.\n[31] E.-A. Lee, M. Tollenaar, ''Physiological basis of successful breeding\nstrategies for maize grain yield'', Crop Sci. 47(S3):S202\u2013S215, 2007.\n[32] Q. Wang, J. Chen, Y. Li. 2004. ''Nondestructive and rapid estimation of\nleaf chlorophyll and nitrogen status of peace lily using chlorophyll\nmeter'', J. Plant Nutr. 27:557-569,2004.\n[33] F. Wiesler, M. Bauer, M. Kamh, T. Engels, S. Reusch, ''The crop as\nindicator for sidedress nitrogen demand in sugar beet productionlimitations\nand perspectives'', J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 165:93-99, 2002.\n[34] J. Uddling, J. Gelang-Alfredson, K. Piikki, H. Pleijel, '' Evaluating the\nrelationship between leaf chlorophyll concentration and SPAD-502\nchlorophyll meter readings’’, Photosynth. Res. 91:37-46, 2007."]}
The present study aimed to investigate whether chlorophyll meter readings (SPAD) can be used as criterion of singleplant selection in maize breeding. Experimentation was performed at the ultra-low density of 0.74 plants/m2 in order the potential yield per plant to be fully expressed. R-31 honeycomb experiments were conducted in three different areas in Greece (Thessaloniki, Giannitsa and Florina) using 30 inbred lines at well-watered and water-stressed conditions during the 2012 growing season. The chlorophyll meter readings had higher rates at dry conditions, except location of Giannitsa where differences were not significant. Genotypes of highest chlorophyll meter readings were consistent across areas, emphasizing on the character’s stability. A positive correlation between the chlorophyll meter readings and grain yield was strengthening over time and culminated at the physiological maturity stage. There was a clear sign that the chlorophyll meter readings has the potential to be used for the selection of stress-adaptive genotypes and may permit modern maize to be grown at wider range of environments addressing the climate change scenarios.
SPAD, Zea mays., Drought-prone environments, honeycomb breeding
SPAD, Zea mays., Drought-prone environments, honeycomb breeding
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts