Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Tilting the Scale: A Theoretical Framework to re-direct Public Policy away from Economic Growth towards Sustainable and Inclusive Wellbeing (Summary)

Authors: Hoekstra, Rutger; Kaufmann, Raphael; Jansen, Annegeke; Barth, Jonathan; Arntzen, Jaap; Aponte, Fabian Rocha; Behrens, Paul; +16 Authors

Tilting the Scale: A Theoretical Framework to re-direct Public Policy away from Economic Growth towards Sustainable and Inclusive Wellbeing (Summary)

Abstract

Current ecological and social crises are fuelling the idea that societies have arrived at an impasse. The “old narrative” which prioritises the pursuit of economic growth does not provide meaningful solutions to the various challenges societies are currently facing. On the contrary, it seems to be a fundamental source of several of its predicaments. Criticisms of this old narrative have existed for decades, alongside the emergence of alternative visions of a good life for all within environmental limits. This report will show that the scientific literature in this field is converging towards a sound theoretical foundation for a new narrative based on the distinction between three dimensions: Wellbeing reflects the average wellbeing of the current generation. Inclusion relates to the distribution of wellbeing between regions and social groups. Sustainability refers to the wellbeing of future generations. In accordance with these dimensions, the main socio-political goal of the new narrative envisioned is therefore defined as sustainable and inclusive wellbeing. However, relative to the economic growth narrative, new narratives have only had a small impact on public policies of national governments or international governance, laws, and treaties. Why? This is one of the enduring questions in the “Beyond-Growth” debate this theoretical framework seeks to address. For this purpose, the theoretical framework develops a theory of institutional change conceptualising how narratives influence the policies, governance, and technical infrastructure (i.e. the metrics, accounts, and macroeconomic models) that shape our societies. The framework is applied to examine both the enduring dominance of the economic growth narrative and the reasons behind the limited success of new narratives thus far. Moreover, the theory of institutional change outlines how a shift from economic growth towards a new narrative may be orchestrated, thus tilting the scale towards sustainable and inclusive wellbeing. It is argued that the establishment of technical infrastructure presents a crucial lever to shape governance and policies, which may give rise to a virtuous circle supporting the institutionalisation of the sustainable and inclusive wellbeing narrative. Given the importance of the technical infrastructure to advance a new narrative within the political institutions, this report provides an interdisciplinary theoretical synthesis to guide the selection and development of metrics, accounting frameworks, and macroeconomic models in line with the sustainable and inclusive wellbeing narrative. The report concludes with eight practical recommendations on how various actors can support the tilting of the scale towards the sustainable and inclusive wellbeing narrative.

Related Organizations
Keywords

macroeconomic model, narrative, accounting system, metric, indicator, institutional change, theoretical framework, beyond GDP, sustainability, wellbeing, inclusion, post-growth, governance, policy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!