Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

SAbyNA D4.2 Requirements for improvement of existing strategies for SbD of NFs/ NEPs to be implemented by industry

Authors: Bossa, Nathan; Burrueco, David; Simeone, Felice; Clavaguera, Simon;

SAbyNA D4.2 Requirements for improvement of existing strategies for SbD of NFs/ NEPs to be implemented by industry

Abstract

This deliverable reports the work executed in H2020 SAbyNA Task 4.2. It evaluates the SbD methods collected in Deliverable4.1 on the basis of their potential usability in industry. Although important from a conceptual point of view, infact, the SbD methods described in D4.1 (available on Zenodo: 10.5281/zenodo.10818663) were not all suitable for industrial nano-manufacturing. To extract usable and accessible SbD methods from the whole list, Partners identified the factors that determine usability: clarity, accessibility, scalability, cost/benefits balance, retention of technical functions, number and types oflimitations. These factors were evaluated for each SbD methods, and this evaluation provided the basis for theirselection. Methods classified as “usable” covered a broad spectrum of practical cases. Partners identified at leastone usable SbD method for minimizing risk arising form the physicochemical drivers described in D4.1; notably,the list reported in this deliverable contains also SbD methods that target risk originating from release ofnanoparticles due to the properties of the supporting matrix. Selected methods covered most of the hazardousmechanisms that determine the toxicity of NF and NEP, and essentially all SbD approaches described in D4.1were described in at least one selected resource. For the usable methods, these deliverable reports usability cardsthat summarize the characteristics of the method, report the target physicochemical property, list potentiallimitation, and report the link to resource. These usability cards provide a useful tool for finding and accessingSbD resources.

Keywords

usability, nanoform, engineered nanomaterial, industry, SSbD, nanoparticle, toxicity, SbD, release, matrix, Safe(r) by Design

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green