Downloads provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["Novit, R. (April 29, 2010). ATC (Aiken Technical College) to Teach\nCritical Thinking Skills in Classroom. Aiken Standard, Retrieved August 7, 2012, from: http:// www.atc.edu/ p372.aspx", "Campbell, J. (2010, November 8). Are youths prepared to work?\nMcClatchy - Tribune Information Services, 3.", "Booi, L. (2011). Critical Thinking: Barriers and Opportunities.\nhttp://www.teachers.ab.ca/Publications/ATA%20Magazine/Volume-91/ Number3/ Pages/ Criticalthinking.aspx", "Florian, T.P. (2010). Confidence-Based Assessment in Moodle: Insights\nfrom Teachers, Administrators and Programmers. (Doctoral\ndissertation). Walden University, Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations\nand Theses. (Accession Order No. AAT 3423706)", "Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of\nEducational Psychology, 46, 128-148.", "Pask, G. (1988). Learning strategies, teaching strategies and conceptual\nor learning style. In R.R. R.R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and\nlearning styles. New York: Plenum Press.", "Entwistle, N.J., McCune, V.& Walker, P. (2000). Conceptions, styles\nand approaches within higher education: analytic abstractions and\neveryday experience. In R. J. Sternberg & L-F. Zhang (Eds.),\nPerspectives on Cognitive, Learning, and Thinking Styles. Mahwah, N.\nJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.", "Entwistle, N. J. (2000). Promoting deep learning through teaching and\nassessment: conceptual fameworks and educational contexts. Paper\npresented at the TLRP Conference, Leicester, England, November, 1-11.\nRetrieved on December 10, 2011 from:\nhttp://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/docs/entwistle2000.pdf", "Williams, K., Wise, S. L. & West, R. F. (2001). Multifaceted\nMeasurement of Critical Thinking Skills in College Students. Paper\npresented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on\nMeasurement in Education, Seattle, Washington, April 10-14, 2-29.\n[10] Facione, P.A. & Facione, N.C. (1992). The California Critical Thinking\nSkills Test. Millbrae, CA, California Academic press.\n[11] Chickering, A.W. & Gamson, Z.F. (1987). Seven Principles For Good\nPractice In Undergraduate Education. AAHE Bulletin, 39 (7), 8-12.\n[12] Dangel, H. L., & Wang, C. X. (2008). Student Response Systems in\nHigher Education: Moving Beyond Linear Teaching and Surface\nLearning. Journal of Educational Technology Development and\nExchange, 1(1), 93-104.\n[13] Facione, P.A. (2004). Retrieved October 31, 2010, from:\nhttp://insightassessment.com.\n[14] Bloom, B.S. & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational\nobjectives: The classification of educational goals, by a committee of\ncollege and university examiners. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain,\nLongman, New York.\n[15] Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D.R. (Eds.).(2001). A taxonomy for\nlearning, teaching and assessing: a revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of\neducational objectives: Complete edition, Longman, New York, 2001.\n[16] Thomas, J.D.E. (2001). \"Technology integration and higher-order\nlearning\", Proceedings of Conference in Advanced Technology in\nEducation Conference, Banff, Calgary, Canada, May.\n[17] Noll, C.L. & Wilkins, M. (2002). Critical skills of IS professionals: a\nmodel for curriculum development. Journal of Information Technology\nEducation, 1(3), 144-154.\n[18] Luckman, S. (2009). New information literacies: Helping university\nstudents critically evaluate information online. International Journal of\nLearning, 16(6), 499-512.\n[19] Wittrock, M.C. (Ed.). (1986). Handbook of research on teaching. NY:\nMacMillan.\n[20] O'Shea, T. & Self, J.A. (1983). Learning and teaching with computers.\nEnglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.\n[21] McEuen, S.F. (2001). How Fluent with information technology are our\nstudents? EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 24(4), 8-17.\n[22] Chism, N. (2004). Using a framework to engage faculty in instructional\ntechnologies. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 27(2), 39-45.\n[23] Thomas, J.D.E., Coppola, J. and Thomas, B. (2001).The Effect of\nTechnology Integration and Critical Thinking Skills in a Graduate\nIntroductory Information Systems Course, Proceedings of the\nInformation Systems Education Conference (ISECON), Cincinnati, Ohio,\nNov. 1-4.\n[24] Thomas, J.D.E., Coppola,J. Braudy,M. and Thomas, B. (2005).\nComparison of Teaching Java in a Computer Classroom /Traditional\nClassroom vs. Smart E-Classroom and its Effect on Critical Thinking: A\nCase Study\", Information Systems Education Journal, 3 (29).\n[25] Barak, M., Harward, J. & Lerman, S. (2007). Studio-based learning via\nwireless notebooks: a case of a Java programming course. International\nJournal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 1(1), 15-29.\n[26] Yeh, Y-C. (2009). Integrating e-learning into the direct-instruction\nmodel to enhance the effectiveness of critical-thinking instruction.\nInstructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences,\n37(2), 185-203.\n[27] Papanis, E., Giavrimis, P. & Papani, E.-M. (2010). The contribution of\nthe Internet into Learning, Review of European Studies, 2(1), 54-60.\nwww.ccsenet.org/res\n[28] Thomas, J.D.E. & Morin, D. (2010). Technological supports for onsite\nand distance education and students' perceptions of acquisition of\nthinking and team-building skills, International Journal of Distance\nEducation Technologies, 8(2), 1-13.\n[29] Thomas, J.D.E. (2007). A survey of knowledge management skills\nacquisition in an online team-based distributed computing course.\nJournal of College Teaching and Learning, 4(9), 39-46. 24.\n[30] Halawi, L.A., McCarthy, R.V. & Pires, S. (2009). An Evaluation of ELearning\non the Basis of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Exploratory study.\nJournal of Education for Business, Viewpoint, 374-380.\n[31] Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R. & Ives, B. (2001). Web-Based Virtual Learning\nEnvironments: A Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment\nof Effectiveness in Basic IT Skills Training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4),\nDecember, p. 401-426.\n[32] Saad\u00e9, R. (2010), Cognitive Mapping Decision Support for the Design\nof Web-based Learning Environments, International Journal of Web-\nBased Learning and Teaching Technologies, 5(3), 36-53.\n[33] Thomas, J.D.E. & Blackwood, M. (2010). Computer Literacy and Non-\nIS majors. Information Systems Education Journal, 8 (58).\nhttp://isedj.org/8/58/. ISSN: 1545-679X, 2010. (A preliminary version\nappears in The Proceedings of ISECON 2009: \u00a73753. ISSN: 1542-\n7382.)\n[34] Thomas, J.D.E. and D. Morin. (2006). Technological Supports and\nStudents' Perceptions of Acquisition of Team-Buiding and Thinking\nSkills. Proceedings of E-Learn 2006 - World Conference on E-Learning\nin Corporate, Government, Healthcare & Higher Education, Honolulu ,\nHawaii, USA, October 13-17, 2436-2441.\n[35] Coppola, J.F. & Thomas, B.A. (2000). Beyond \"chalk and talk\": a\nmodel for e-classroom design, T.H.E. (Technological Horizons in\nEducation) Journal, 27(6), p. 30-36."]}
While computers are known to facilitate lower levels of learning, such as rote memorization of facts, measurable through electronically administered and graded multiple-choice questions, yes/no, and true/false answers, the imparting and measurement of higher-level cognitive skills is more vexing. These require more open-ended delivery and answers, and may be more problematic in an entirely virtual environment, notwithstanding the advances in technologies such as wikis, blogs, discussion boards, etc. As with the integration of all technology, merit is based more on the instructional design of the course than on the technology employed in, and of, itself. With this in mind, this study examined the perceptions of online students in an introductory Computer Information Systems course regarding the fostering of various higher-order thinking and team-building skills as a result of the activities, resources and technologies (ART) used in the course.
virtual environments., distance learning, online learning, deep learning, elearning, Critical thinking
virtual environments., distance learning, online learning, deep learning, elearning, Critical thinking
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 | |
| downloads | 6 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts