Downloads provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["Afuah, A. (2003). Innovation management: strategies, implementation,\nand profits, Oxford University Press, USA (2nd ed )", "Asakawa, K. (2001). Organizational tension in international R&D\nmanagement: the case of Japanese firms, Research Policy, Vol. 30\n(2001), p. 735-757", "Asakawa, K. and Lehrer, M. (2003). Managing local knowledge assets\nglobally: The role of regional innovation relays, Journal of World\nBusiness, Vol.38 No.1: 31-42.", "Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive\nAdvantage, Journal of Management; Mar 1991; Vol. 17, No. 1; p. 99-\n120.", "Chesbrough, Henry (2003). The Era of Open Innovation, MIT Sloan\nManagement Review, Spring 2003.", "Chesbrough, Henry (2004). Managing Open Innovation, Research\nTechnology Management, January-February 2004, p. 23-26.", "Chesbrough, Henry & Schwartz, Kevin (2007). Innovating Business\nModels with Co-development Partnerships, Research Technology\nManagement, January-February 2007, p. 55-59.", "Davies, A., Brady, T, Hobday, M., 2006. Charting a Path Toward\nIntegrated Solutions, MIT Sloan Management Review, Spring 2006,\nVol. 47, No. 3.", "Day, GS (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations, Journal\nof Marketing, 1994.\n[10] Deshpand\u00e9, R and Farley, JU 1998. The market orientation construct:\ncorrelations, culture, and comprehensiveness, Journal of Market-Focused\nManagement, 1998\n[11] Doz, Y & Kosonen, M. (2008). The Dynamics of Strategic Agility:\nNokia's Rollercoaster Experience, California Management Review, 2008\n[12] Eisenhardt, K.M. & Martin, J.A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are\nthey?, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21 Iss. 10-11 (Oct 2000), p.\n1105 - 1121\n[13] Galbraith, J.R., 2002. Organizing to Deliver Solutions, Organizational\nDynamics, Autumn 2002.\n[14] Hamel, G. and C. K. Prahalad (1994). Competing for the Future.\nHarvard Business School Press, Boston, MA\n[15] Hammond, Keeney, Raiffa (1998). The Hidden Traps in Decision\nMaking, Harvard Business Review, Sept.-Oct. 1998\n[16] Hart, S.L. (1995). A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm,\nAcademy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 4 (Oct., 1995), p. 986-\n1014.\n[17] Hill, R.C. & Levenhagen, M. (1995). Metaphors and Mental Models:\nSensemaking and Sensegiving in Innovative and Entrepreneurial\nActivities, Journal of Management, Vol. 21, No. 6, 1057-1074 (1995)\n[18] Jarzabkowski, P. (2004). Strategy as Practice: Recursiveness,\nAdaptation, and Practices-in-Use, Organization Studies, 25(4): p. 529-\n560.\n[19] Kohli, AK and Jaworski, BJ (1990). Market orientation: the construct,\nresearch propositions, and managerial implications, Journal of\nMarketing, 1990.\n[20] Kohli, AK and Jaworski, BJ (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and\nconsequences, Journal of Marketing, 1993.\n[21] Lehrer, M. and K. Asakawa (2003). Managing intersecting R&D social\ncommunities: A comparative study of European knowledge incubators in\nJapanese and American firms, Organization Studies, Vol.24. (2003)\n[22] Moran, Mike (2007). Do It Wrong Quickly: How the Web Changes the\nOld Marketing Rules, IBM Press, 1 edition, 2007.\n[23] Narver, JC and Slater, SF (1990). The effect of a market orientation on\nbusiness profitability, Journal of Marketing, 1990.\n[24] Porac, J., Ventresca, M. and Mishina, Y. (2002). \"Interorganizational\nCognition and Interpretation.\" In Joel Baum (Ed.), Companion to\nOrganizations, p. 579-598: Oxford, UK: Blackwell.\n[25] Slater, SF and Narver, JC (1995).Market orientation and the learning\norganization, Journal of Marketing, 1995\n[26] Solomon, M. R. (2003). Conquering Consumerspace, New York:\nAMACOM.\n[27] Teece, D.J., Pisano, G and Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and\nstrategic management, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, Iss.7\n(1997), p. 509-533\n[28] Tikkanen, H., Lamberg, J.A., Parvinen, P., and Kallunki, J.P. (2005).\nManagerial cognition, action and the business model of the firm,\nManagement Decision, Vol. 43, Iss. 6, 2005\n[29] Treacy, M. and Wiersema, F. (1993). Customer intimacy and other value\ndisciplines, Harvard business review, 1993\n[30] Tuli, K.R, Kohli, A.K, and Bharadwaj, S.G., 2007. Rethinking Customer\nSolutions: From Product Bundles to Relational Processes, Journal of\nMarketing, July 2007, Vol. 71, p. 1-17.\n[31] Vargo, S.L. & Lusch, R.F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for\nmarketing, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 68, Iss. 1, 2004, p. 1-17.\n[32] Vargo, S.L. & Lusch, R.F. (2006). Service-dominant logic: reactions,\nreflections and refinements, Marketing Theory, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2006, p.\n281-288\n[33] Walsh, J. (1995) Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a\ntrip down memory lane, Organization Science, 6 (May-June), 280-321.\n[34] Wise, R. & Baumgartner, P., 1999. Go Downstream: The New Profit\nImperative of Manufacturing, Harvard Business Review, September-\nOctober 1999.\n[35] Zahra, S.A. & George, G. (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A Review,\nReconceptualization, and Extension, Academy of Management Review,\n2002, Vol. 17., No. 2, 185-203."]}
This is a conceptual paper on the application of open innovation in three case examples of Apple, Nintendo, and Nokia. Utilizing key concepts from research into managerial and organizational cognition, we describe how each company overcame barriers to utilizing open innovation strategy in R&D and commercialization projects. We identify three levels of barriers: cognitive, behavioral, and institutional, and describe the companies balanced between internal and external resources to launch products that were instrumental in companies reinventing themselves in mature markets.
managerial cognition, open innovation.
managerial cognition, open innovation.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 18 | |
| downloads | 61 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts