
This article, based on joint work with Gabriel Carroll, Andy Itsara, Ian Le, Gregg Musiker, Gregory Price, Dylan Thurston, and Rui Viana, presents a combinatorial model based on perfect matchings that explains the symmetries of the numerical arrays that Conway and Coxeter dubbed frieze patterns. This matchings model is a combinatorial interpretation of Fomin and Zelevinsky's cluster algebras of type A. One can derive from the matchings model an enumerative meaning for the Markoff numbers, and prove that the associated Laurent polynomials have positive coefficients as was conjectured (much more generally) by Fomin and Zelevinsky. Most of this research was conducted under the auspices of REACH (Research Experiences in Algebraic Combinatorics at Harvard).
Presented at the 18th International Conference on Formal Power Series and Algebraic Combinatorics. (Revised June 2006: I corrected a mis-statement at the end of section 2, and added reference to recent unpublished work of Hickerson. Revised May 2007: I correct a typo and added a paragraph.) Published as Integers, Volume 20 (2020), article A12; http://math.colgate.edu/~integers/u12/u12.pdf
Laurent phenomenon, cluster algebras, Markov and Lagrange spectra and generalizations, Combinatorial aspects of tessellation and tiling problems, 05C70, Cluster algebras, Exact enumeration problems, generating functions, FOS: Mathematics, Laurent polynomial, Mathematics - Combinatorics, Combinatorics (math.CO)
Laurent phenomenon, cluster algebras, Markov and Lagrange spectra and generalizations, Combinatorial aspects of tessellation and tiling problems, 05C70, Cluster algebras, Exact enumeration problems, generating functions, FOS: Mathematics, Laurent polynomial, Mathematics - Combinatorics, Combinatorics (math.CO)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
