
Annual Increment is one of the most awaited events in the life of an employee. All members of the job wait for this declaration with equal interest. Males and females equally desire to have a fair increment for their performances. Factors like qualification, achievements, contribution, publication, participation, customer feedback, willingness to take responsibility, team work, etc. are the basis for appraisal system which decides employees’ annual increment. The case highlights the defective rational for deciding increment for employee in an educational institute. The irrational decision policy demotivates to the extent that employee withdraws herself from active role to passive role and decides to quit. Key words: Appraisal, Discrimination, Annual Increment, Employee Expectation
Discrimination,, Annual Increment,, Employee Expectation, Appraisal,
Discrimination,, Annual Increment,, Employee Expectation, Appraisal,
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
