{"references": ["Hinds, Pamela; Kiesler, Sara (edts), Distributed Work. Cambridge,\nMassachusets: The MIT Press, 2002.", "DeSanctis, G., and Monge, P. Introduction: Communication processes\nfor virtual organizations. Organization Science (Special Issue).", "Maznevski, M. L., and Chudoba, K. M. (2000). Bridging space over\ntime: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization\nScience.", "Monge, R. R., and Kirste, K. K. (1980). Measuring proximity in human\norganizations. Social Psychology Quarterly.", "Allen, T. (1977). Managing the flow of technology. Cambridge, MA:\nMIT Press.", "Kraut, R., and Streeter, L. (1995). Coordination in software\ndevelopment. Communications of the ACM.", "Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology. Stanford, CA: Stanford\nUniversity Press.", "Schwaber, K., and Beedle, M. (2002). Agile Software Development with\nScrum, Prentice Hall.", "Kniberg, H. (2007). Scrum and XP from the Trenches. InfoQ.\n[10] Cockburn, A. (2001). Agile Software Development. Addison-Wesley.\n[11] Sykes, R. E., Larntz, K., and Fox, J. C. (1976). Proximity and similarity\neffects on frequency of interaction in a class of naval recruits.\nSociometry.\n[12] Doherty-Sneddon, G., Anderson, A., O-Malley, C., Langton, S., Garrod,\nS., and Bruce, V. (1997). Face-to-face and video mediated\ncommunication: A comparison of dialog structure and task performance.\nJournal of Experimental Psychology: Applied.\n[13] O-Conaill, B., Whittaker, S., and Wilbur, S. (1993). Conversations over\nvideoconference: an evaluation of the spoken aspects of video mediated\ninteraction. Human-Computer Interaction.\n[14] Short, J., Williams, E., and Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of\ntelecommunications. New York: Wiley.\n[15] Daft, R., and Lengel, R. (1984). Information richness: a new approach to\nmanagerial behavior and organization design. Research in Organization\nBehavior.\n[16] Clark, H., and Brennan, S. (1990). Grounding in communication. In L.\nResnick, J. Levine, and S. Teasley (eds.), Perspectives on socially\nshared cognition. Washington, D.C: APA Press.\n[17] Kiesler, S., and Cummings, J. (2002). What Do We Know About\nProximity and Distance in Work Groups? Alegacy of Research. In\nHinds, Pamela; Kiesler, Sara (edts). Distributed Work. Cambridge,\nMassachusets: The MIT Press.\n[18] Saegert, S., Swarp, W., and Zajonc, R. B. (1973). Exposure, context, and\ninterpersonal attraction. Journal od Personality and Social Psychology.\n[19] Beck, K et al (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development\n.\n[20] Brockner, J., and Swap, W. C. (1976). Effects of repeated exposure and\nattitudinal similarity on self-disclosure and interpersonal attraction.\nJournal of Personality and Social Psychology.\n[21] Ebbesen, E., Kjos, G., and Konecni, V. (1976). Spatial ecology: Its\neffects on the choice of friends and enemies. Journal of Personality and\nSocial Psychology.\n[22] Hays, R. B. (1985). A longitudinal study of friendship development.\nJournal of Personality and Social Psychology.\n[23] Newcomb, T. R. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt,\nRinehart and Winston.\n[24] Festinger, L., Schacter, S., and Back, K. (1950). Individual and small\ngroup territories. Small Group Behavior.\n[25] Insko, C., and Wilson, M. (1977). Interpersonal attraction as a function\nof social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.\n[26] Hansen, M. (1999). The search transfer problem: The role of weak ties\nin sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative\nScience Quarterly.\n[27] Sillince, J.A. \"A Model of Social, Emotional and Symbolic Aspects of\nComputer-Mediated Communication within Organizations,\" in\nComputer Supported Cooperative Work, VOL. 4, 1996, pp. 1-31.\n[28] Dourish, P., Bly, S. \"Portholes: Supporting Awareness in a Distributed\nwork Group\". Proc. ACM CHI-92. 1992.\n[29] Honda, S., Ohsawa, T., Tomioka, H., Kimura T., Okada K., and\nMatsushita Y. A Virtual Office Environment for Home Office Worker\nBased on 3D Virtual Space. 1997"]}

This paper describes the two actual tendencies in the software development process usage: 'Scrum' and 'work in home office'. It-s exposed the four main challenges to adopt Scrum framework for distributed teams in this cited kind of work. The challenges are mainly based on the communication problems due distances since the Scrum encourages the team to work together in the same room, and this is not possible when people work distributed in their homes.