Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Toward a Quality Model for Hybrid Intelligence Teams - Supplementary Material

Authors: Dell'Anna, Davide; Murukannaiah, Pradeep K.; Dudzik, Bernd; Grossi, Davide; Jonker, Catholijn M.; Oertel, Catharine; Yolum, Pinar;

Toward a Quality Model for Hybrid Intelligence Teams - Supplementary Material

Abstract

Supplementary material for paper: Dell’Anna D, Murukannaiah PK, Dudzik B, Grossi D, Jonker CM, Oertel C, et al. Toward a Quality Model for Hybrid Intelligence Teams. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, AAMAS 2024 # GENERAL INFORMATION ## Title Supplementary material for paper "Toward a Quality Model for Hybrid Intelligence Teams" # FILE OVERVIEW ``` AAMAS2024_Toward_HI_Quality_Model_Supplementary_Material │ README.md │ Group Discussion - Handout - Essentials # The printed version of the questionnaires (Essentials) and team descriptions handed out to the groups for the group discussion │ Group Discussion - Handout - Enablers # The printed version of the questionnaires (Enablers, except Coaching) and team descriptions handed out to the groups for the group discussion │ Group Discussion - Handout - Processes # The printed version of the questionnaires (Coaching and Key Task Processes) and team descriptions handed out to the groups for the group discussion │ Individual Response - Online Survey # A PDF version of the online survey └───Individual Response - Results # Excel file with all the responses of the participants from the online survey. Excel sheets are organized as follows RAW DATA # all the raw data from the survey RAW DATA TRANSPOSED # raw data with rows and columns inverted ALL TEAMS SCORES # quantitative results about adequacy for each feature: team scores and importance ALL FEEDBACK PER FEATURE # qualitative results about adequacy for each feature: grouped feedback participants forlatex # results in latex-ready form forspider # results in a form that supports easy creation of spider plot EFFECTIVENESS # quantitative results about effectiveness measures FINAL COMMENTS # final qualitative feedback from participants essentials # RAW DATA TRANSPOSED (essentials only) enablers # RAW DATA TRANSPOSED (enablers only) processes # RAW DATA TRANSPOSED (processes only) *_num_scores # * in {essentials, enablers, processes}, likert-to-numerical scores *_num_scores_annotatio # same as *_num_scores, just with numerical values instead of formulas ```

Related Organizations
Keywords

hybrid intelligence, human-ai teams, team diagnostic survey

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Beta
sdg_colorsSDGs:
Related to Research communities