Generally, this study aims to obtain a description of the difference between the influence of wall exercise model and machine exercise model, the interaction between forehand training model and achievement motivation, the difference between the influence of the wall exercise model and the machine exercise model for students who have high achievement motivation and the difference of the effect of the wall exercise model and the machine exercise model for students with low achievement motivation for tennis forehand skills. The method used in this research is experimental method with 2 x 2 factorial design, the population of all students of PJKR in 5th semester of FKIP Unsil Tasikmaya is 378 students, there are 115 samples with random sampling technique, while data collection technique is using test and measurement and the analytical technique is used by two-lane variance analysis (ANOVA) with 2 x 2 factorial design. There is a difference in learning outcomes of tennis forehand skills between machine exercise model and wall exercise model (Fo = 58,4820> Ft = 4.11). There is an interaction between the exercise model and the achievement motivation for the forehand tennis skills (Fo = 50, 5620> Ft = 4.11). There is a difference between forehand learning outcomes using machine exercise model and wall exercise model for highly motivated students (Qo = 5.9032> Qt = 3.79), there is a difference between forehand learning outcomes using machine model of exercise and wall exercise model towards low motivated student (Qo = 22,54> Qt = 3,79). It is suggested to teach groups of students who have high achievements by using the machine or wall exercise model to improve their tennis forehand skills. Meanwhile, to teach students who have low achievement motivation is expected to use the wall exercise model.